OPEN MOUTH, OPEN MIND: AN IMPRESSIONISTIC ATTEMPT AT A TRANSPERSONAL
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
PART 1. " ENERGIES" AND STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS
PART 2. LIVING AND LOSING WITH HIGH ENERGIES
PART 3. TRANSPERSONAL FOX SPEAKING IN A TRAP OR HOW I WAS CORNERED BUT
MANAGED NOT TO MAKE THE PROPER CONCLUSIONS
T. R. SOIDLA
INSTITUTE OF
CYTOLOGY ST. PETERSBURG. RUSSIA
Parts 1 and 2 reprinted from the International
Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 1995, Vol. 14 (Supplement), pp. 30-42,
pp. 43-59; Part 3, 1995, Vol. 14, pp. 1-29.
Author's address: T. R. Soidla, Institute of Cytology, Tikhoretsky Avenue 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, RUSSIA.
OPEN MOUTH, OPEN MIND: AN
IMPRESSIONISTIC ATTEMPT AT A TRANSPERSONAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY PART 1.
"ENERGIES" AND STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS
T. R. SOIDLA
INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA
One cannot resist the temptation of seeing some order and even some
lessons in one's life ("experiential background"). I can only hope
that as a proto-scientific human being, partially naive and partially
brainwashed in Marxist, Christian, and materialistic science waters, I can
offer something of interest to my transpersonal colleagues-some vision born
from no teacher, chaotic reading, and quite controversial aspirations. As I
want to keep this paper as short as possible, I'll first relate some seemingly
most important "core" stories. An attempt at theorizing will follow
with some additional stories.
Story 1. Early morning in Stary Peterhof (a suburb of Leningrad, now St.
Petersburg). Bright Sun makes a promise of heat, but it is still quite cool. I,
bearded and with long hair in the best traditions of a young intellectual of
the '60s, leave my home just to meet three personalities in a hopeless search
for some alcohol (it is clearly too early for this by Soviet standards of these
years). One of them raises his a bit reddish eyes to me, and finding hardly
enough power to speak, nevertheless cannot help saying some words that sound
almost unbearably tender, "You fucking ape, why are you here?"
Something like this. It was much better in Russian (one can tell a lot of
things better in Russian), but I beg you to believe the feeling of most
compassionate, loving kindness, of almost superhuman tenderness. One can caress
a fresh wound this way, possibly. Something like this would reduce Nietzsche to
a young innocent schoolboy. Maybe something like this Omar Khayyam was able to
communicate to his compatriots.
You can well guess the following. I tried to ape (sorry for this
masochistic play of words) the message that was communicated to me. I
understood the main role of the intonation: a kind of most sacrilegious loving
kindness. I understood the people in the streets speaking exactly this
seemingly nasty and wasteful way. Indeed, it seemingly gave the power to resist
the almost unbearable pressure of life. I started applying it now and then,
mostly outwardly silent (it worked this way also). And then, as if told by some
ultimate authority, I stopped it. Everything was clear once more. Here was a
kind of pay one had to give away for this kind of help. And I realized, that at
least for me, the pay was unquestionably too high. And I stopped it. It is easy
to label it an illusion of some kind, colored in Christian tones. Indeed I
believe--or pretend-to be a Christian of a kind. I cannot be sure that all this
is not an illusion, indeed, I feel quite ready to agree . . . one day. But here
I would better like to be involved in a game of searching for some reality
behind this "illusion," and for that I need a comparison with some
more stories.
Story 2. Here I am to introduce a personality who is of much greater scale than
myself, generally friendly, towering over my problems and ideas, and so even if
this story is about something important, it is narrated from a Lilliputian
point of view. To protect his privacy I'll denote him simply A.V. Anyway,
forgive me, A.V., please! I'll begin! Maybe 20 years ago I was introduced to a
young cabbalist who turned out to be two heads above my intellectual level, to
say nothing about spiritual, where even an attempt of comparison would have
been just ridiculous. Maybe most important was that at this time he had
obviously also overgrown the limitations of Cabbala, but I would say some old
powers were still present. In these old days A.V. ignored, in a most civilized
and friendly manner, my silent and not fully conscious yearning to learn some
esoteric ways. His attitude was curiously complemented by my own mixture of
vulgarity, cowardliness, and deep reverence towards him and many of his close
friends. (It is, of course, different now: some useful intellectual tricks and
possibly also some acquired illusions have changed me to a point where it is
just strange and exciting to recall the memory of a provincial youngster
entering an elaborately ritualized world of the former Russian capital
inhabited by young proud intellectuals and most civilized cranks.) But in these
days I spent many evenings in a small company around A.V. On the social and
most tangible level He was brimming with various teaching stories. What is
important here is that I just could not help imitating Him in many minute
details, sometimes even forgetting the obvious hazard of being caught as a
plagiarist. I do not know why, but some few seemingly not so important things I
could not resist attempting to copy. There was something special in them. One
such thing was a very special laughter of His. Even more specifically—there was
one very special tone in his most civilized paroxysms of impersonal almost
cosmic intellectual superiority I just could not resist trying to apply towards
some younger friends of mine. It worked! And how! I was ready for a small
successful intellectual theft. But what really happened was that I was
converted to a channel of a cold unearthly intellectual wind that not only
almost effortlessly pierced any problem, but was also beautiful as a work of great
art. Left for me was just to keep the right tone and to collect some emotional
(most pleasant) tax for the channeling. And then I understood once more: I am
to stop it. It was much more difficult than in my first story and sometimes I
still feel myself if not exactly using this channel then bathing intellectually
in some seemingly more innocent (and still quite powerful) side currents of
this intellectual presence. And once more I must insist—the truth about this
story must really be something different than what our poor words
"illusion" or "presence" or "energy" or
"channeling" (one is tempted to use with a story like this) would
allow to express.
Of course, A.V. I can consider in this story as
a "superpsychocatalyst" (forgive the most ugly word, please), who did
not even change as a result of the above story (that is typical for catalysts),
and certainly does not bear any responsibility for anything that happened to
me.
Story 3. Here I must
confess (and this can sound most suspicious) that I have really forgotten most
of the prototype story of this last one of my core material. What has remained
in memory looks not too reliably like a kind of composite portrait by Galton at
best (see Sheldrake, 1987). At the same time I have a definite feeling (or is
it an illusion) that most readers have some experience with stories like this.
So, let's try the reconstruction. I was twice or so in a situation in my former
marriage where a lot depended on only one sentence or so, of something very
simple and . . . seemingly impossible to do. My one sentence could make it all
right, but it meant to admit openly something I could not confess even to
myself, or so it seemed. Maybe what was needed even felt like a kind of coming
Ego death (or is one allowed to make a joke about a foretaste of Ego
fainting?). Excuse me, I really do not know, there are situations when the
right thing to do means making a most "counter-realistic" step
forward-through an invisible but impenetrable barrier. And then--I do not know
how--indeed it happened that I told what was needed of me and then everything
was converted to a pure celebration of heavenly cool happiness and peace. I had
suffered, I had died, but I was resurrected now. As a result everything was
O.K. (but it had looked so hopeless—my incapacity to cope with the situation
had been so obvious). In a way I was in a situation of Ultimate Creativity.
(Warning! I seem to have gotten trapped in rhetoric.) But some cold water is to
follow. It is so easy, so soothing to tell this story that I would like to
repeat it again and again. But I really cannot, at least I have never managed
to do it once more in my real life during all the years after the last one of
these stories. Maybe I stop at the barrier of ego damage. Possibly my
psychological "satellite service" helps me to keep far away from most
situations of this kind. I guess there are other instant emergency strategies
saving me (as a comic strip hero) from being really involved. So my last story
carries certainly some marks of a Liar's story, yet I ask you to believe it.
Some analysis at the face level. Hesitation, some insights, a general
confusion. At first level this is just once more a story of trapping
"cosmic" energies in a real life situation. Something for a small
exchange with my subculture partners on a level of some group work ... or a
short letter to a (quasi) mystical newspaper. Is there anything really worthy
of discussion in these experiences of mine? Of course, any experience with
"subtle energies" one can just label "neurotic" and this
would be the very end of the story. But one can suppose that most valuable
facts for a tomorrow's science lie in today's science waste-basket. Let's
suppose that energies are just energies. Then, consulting, for example, a paper
by Green and Green (1971), it is easy to see that the energy level of the dirty
talk story described here most likely corresponds to the etheric or astral
levels of esoteric metaphysical systems. The seemingly disgusting aftereffects
and the very stylistic feeling of dirty talk seem to point to a lower astral
(emotional) level. There are many lines of thinking about why lower astral is
not the best realm for a permanent contact. I would rather not subscribe to any
concrete explanation: my experience seemingly involves too few details to allow
much speculation (but also see below some additional material about the
"third eye" training and obviously much higher intensities of energy
flow that resulted in some more dramatic developments). What is possibly not so
trivial is the seeming contact with energies using "feeling-tone"
(Gray, 1979; LaViolette, 1979) that seems quite naturally to mark some
"source" that is "feeding" (sustaining) the particular type
of real life situation. Following this tone seems to allow to tap this source,
the "well-spring" of this energy. One feels also tempted to create a
catalogue of such patterns (of real life "type" situations). We still
do not have a science of description of human life as a succession of a limited
number of "patterns" that would be most helpful, for example, for
discussing human dimensions of all the ill-defined changes of life-style we are
supposedly to undergo in future and related problems. What we need seems to be
a kind of modern variety of the Chinese "Book of Changes" (I Ching),
Maybe the controversial perceived energies and their aftereffects can be of
some help in creating such a "periodical system"? Would not such an
energy-based classification be more predictive in discussing our future? My
rather limited experience discussed in this paper seems to say that this is
possibly worth trying.
About the other stories of my "starting material," they
possibly promise more sense (or anyway better reading) in Christian
fundamentalist coordinates. (Maybe saying this I am playing some rhetorical
games once more.) Anyway, I start again with Green and Green (1971). Let's take
things once more at their face value and then my flow of seemingly mental
energy seems to be fed from a source at the mental or even at the causal or
intuitional level, from a region where personal and transpersonal meet: maybe
from the Lotus part, but what I really felt was a cold cosmic breeze . . . to
speak a bit too metaphorically perhaps-blowing around some (psychical) bridge
(adding more and more metaphors—or are these terms I am just not quite at home
with 7—some concepts like black Lotus, pseudo-Nirvana, etc., seem to be in some
way connected with this experience). Here I certainly must also refer to a
kind of fundamentalist interpretation. In this black/white world view (maybe it
is the right world view, I don't know!), I was seemingly involved in a contact
with a demonic intellect (which possibly means that this phenomenon was well
known to the humanitarian culture of the "Dark" ages. These ages seem
to have been so productive in creating fundamentalist texts . . . maybe being
more sensitive to the dualistic dimension of our existence . . . but cannot one
also refer to traditions, social institutions, and intellectual market
values?). And once more, below, I'll relate some more stories with
visualizations and higher energetic levels telling about both some more dreams
and feelings of mine connected with A.V., and about a visualization almost unquestionably
related to the traditional demonic realm and of transmutations between positive
and negative energy that convinced W. Blake and confused me. I'll leave it to
you to make your conclusions.
The third story is of course to be interpreted as occurring on the
higher, transpersonal levels of Green and Green (1971). I have a feeling that
the third story possibly gains more depth in a theoretical (maybe heretical)
framework centered around the word LOGOS. Indeed, around the concept of Logos
are grouped concepts of ultimate suffering, death, resurrection, ultimate
creativity and the Quest for Holy Spirit. Heretical can seem indeed the concept
of having a glimpse of this complex by a lay person, but maybe it is just a
question of finding a terminology both exact and humble enough. At least my own
eclectic metaphysical belief system, together with some very deeply rooted
"spiritual instincts," suggest "simply" to abandon the
levels of the first two stories and to follow a compass of the energies of the
third story. There is possibly nothing wrong with the lower (but unique?)
levels, at least healing in Russian folk tales needs not only the highest
healing principle: "the water of life." It always starts at a lower
level. "The dead water" and a magical formula are to be applied first
and only then the water of life can be used. A (w)holistic attitude, indeed.
But it is possibly also true, that one cannot just pour more and more tea; one
must also empty one's cup, as a Zen story tells us. Anyway, maybe one would be
justified to summarize that the energies of my three stories seem to circulate
at (and possibly stabilize) the astral-emotional ("dead water,"
the principle of FORM), mental-causal ("magical formula"),
and above causal ("water of life") levels of reality as
described in the traditional esoteric metaphysical systems.
I would like to suppose that these levels are made explicit by
stabilizing corresponding types of real life situations (behavioral patterns).
I have speculated on memory as a result of editing some inherited proto-human
life story (Soidla, 1992, 1993a, 1993b). In terms of this hypothesis, the
perceived energies of stabilization of these behavioral patterns (life
situations) are related to mechanisms of creating different classes of high
abstraction level associative memory engrams. We perceive energies when our
memory recording mechanism feels it worth to record (to repeat recording)
something in our high hierarchical level associative memory engrams. Such
engrams are according to my hypothesis themselves active in further memory
recording. What we have done with our life (what we have attained) yesterday
determines what we'll see (what we'll record in our memory) tomorrow. We
perceive as energy something that determines the world that is "waiting
for us." I would even suppose that the state of high abstraction level
associative memory engrams change (pre-edit) the inherited human life story,
donating (excising) certain repetitive patterns—so easy to do according to the
biochemical bases of editing-like processes (Soidla, 1993a, 1993b). This
creates some almost imperceptible (but incessant) pressure to live through
special kinds of situations, a feeling of changing the patterns, the
"meaningful coincidences flow" in one's life. We 'II see below some
illustrations/or this possibility. Anyway, my main point here is simply
that the energy levels of traditional metaphysical systems (rather than being
pure theoretical constructions) seem to be easily contacted in real-life
situations and to be able to serve as useful guides for handling some practical
everyday psychological problems. I propose my three stories to mark three major
levels of this kind.
Some More Stories. How to start bad trips in the "lower
astral." Conversion of energies. Two initiations in dreams (cunning
energies and a half-forgotten exchange in a "secret" room of a
Spanish style Church). Just sitting. A midsummer Nightmare. "Quite
Holy." she told me. "You have never been a good man. except . . .
." The "currency exchange" with everyday life. Many systems of
inner cartography are available to organize one's "occult" and
mystical experience, constituting a challenge for the self-made-psychic who is
never quite ready to subscribe to any tailor-made system (at least without some
independent personal confirmation).
Is there really an astral world lurking for us (say, somewhere behind
the etheric delights)? I am not quite sure about occult topography, but with
some horrific experience of this kind I had indeed to make acquaintance with. I
tried a certain technique to develop my "third eye" (Sakharov, 1993)
based on a concentration on an imaginary line between the pineal gland
and a point between one's eyebrows. (I was also involved in some other equally
"esoteric" activities so this is by no means anything like an
experiment, when one is aware of what is kept constant and what really varies.)
The first signs of some success were dreams with intensified color, then
geometrical figures entered, and then I began to have some difficulty leaving
the special fluorescent image-laden states even being awake. Instead of the
innocent geometry I started with, now pseudobiological forms emerged with
typical surrealistic distortions and dizzying ways of mimicking biological
movement. I learned several things: first and maybe most important among them
was that upward direction is indeed quite special and leads away from the most
"hellish" complex of feelings. So it occurred to me that the upward
and downward directions ascribed to metaphysical "heaven" and
"hell" (or the spatial component of the technical term "lower
astral") correspond indeed to some realities--at least to the ones of our
psychical space and that this knowledge must be considered most important--and
practical. I did not like this experience (happily I succeeded a bit in taming
the most exotic antics of this "level").
I was scared and impressed by a coincidence of some especially malicious
imagery of this kind with a real serious epileptic fit of my son one night. For
me the feeling of being in the lower astral level seemed to be only too real
during this story. Alas, I cannot report any evidence in favor of the dirty
talk images energy in my first story being related to the same level. Maybe I
can count as a connection some feeling of pure stylistic ties between the dirty
talk imagery and quite direct experience of the "realities" of the
lower astral level. Maybe, they are different, but close levels? Remember old
fashioned Science Fiction and the idea about an electromagnetic "echo"
between neighbor coils of magnetic tape of one's fate prerecording? Maybe we
would do better to subscribe to something like this? Who knows? ... but let's
(for the sake of consistency, at least) follow the main line of argumentation
of this treatise. What was most important for me practically (but also created
a source of some philosophical doubts), was learning to transmute negative
energy to positive energy. After some time, when hypnagogic and hypnopompic
lower astral imagery grew just maddening, I got the necessary help from a paper
by Crampton (1974). I learned just to cease resisting and to assume a friendly,
accepting feeling towards everything that was to happen. As a result, the
maddening xenophobic feelings and imagery (N.B.! UFOlogists!) changed to a
celestial scene of abstract cosmic beauty. (Circular opening to a cloudless
deep blue sky (?) with no "fish-eye" distortions, with a fence of
bright-colored a bit Mondrian-style rods.) W. Blake (1964) confronting the same
phenomenon in his famous "Marriage of Heaven and Hell" changed the
hair-raising view of the Leviathan to a rather bucolic scene and came to the
conclusion that everything depends on one's point of view and that the Hell is
not so bad a place at all. (In a way this is, of course, an oversimplification
of Blake's powerful metaphysics. Obviously I express a bit different—more
"Blakean"-view of the problem in my own molecular model at the very
end of this paper.) Here I just want to confess a great difficulty in accepting
a world-view with hierarchies of negative energies.
With some feeling of confusion, I would suppose
that the apparent "negative energy" is just an excess of energy plus
a painful block for the energy flow. Then my experience of "transmuting
the energies" shows nothing else than freeing oneself from the fears (and
clinging) of ego and as a result-removing the block. This unblocking is
experienced as "tunneling" to the apparent positive (or
"upper") realm of energies with a feeling of having reached our
natural "home" (no wonder, one has experienced an ultimate
relaxation, as a reductionist in me intervenes). Any colorful details show
one's ability to simulate a world (or is something like collective unconscious [Great
Mind, Consciousness unlimited] really involved ... or reached?). I am ready
to admit that possibly my experience is not so easily explained by the standard
Seven or so Levels Model (SLM), but (maybe being scared by too radical
alternative possibilities of hierarchies of energies with different signs
[charms, colors], or of trans-personal blocks for energy flow) I prefer to
tolerate some contradictions and to remain at least in this paper in the realm
of SLM as discussed by Green and Green (1971). You have possibly noticed, that
with me it is a heavily Christianized SLM.
Now I'll add some more material relevant to the
second story. Some literature popular in the early '60s resulted in my
subconscious expectations towards A.V. as a Magus figure, so, no wonder, one
night I dreamed about a spirit tamed by A.V. and used in various household
tasks. In the dream A.V. told me the necessary magical words (quite like in a
typical fairy tale, or a Gothic story) to become a master of the spirit. There
was some break in time, then I found myself alone, tried the words, and lo, I
was the master. But an absolutely unexpected thing for me was that the mastery
was not. something abstractly or mechanically connected to me; it was my state,
a state of very high energy, brimming with potentiality for performing
anything. The feeling of capability for unusual feats was not external for me;
it was an inseparable part of myself But at the same time the energy had an
intellect of its own and almost the first thing it performed was to tell me
some words to summon a much more powerful spirit. I uttered the words and then
at the very same moment a surge of tremendous energy shot through me—meeting no
resistance and leaving a feeling of partial amnesia, physical signs of
ejaculation, and as an afterthought--a shameful feeling that I am not ready yet
for real magic. I must stress here, that almost everything I learned this night
was new for me, starting with the very feeling of high energies and especially
their intimate connection both with me and at the same time with some separate
intelligent (cunning) entities.
The other story I want to
relate here has almost faded in my memory leaving just some bleak images and at
the same time some insistent feeling of importance. A.V. was not personally
present, but the story seemed to be one way or another connected with him. I
had a feeling of being present in a some way secret room of a Spanish style
church (?) that seemed to be not quite unknown to me. An old man clothed in a
way that I was not able to classify (it seemed not to be anything like the
usual clothes of the clergy, rather of a kind of an ancient Master-in a quite
prosaic sense) was sitting on a bench facing me. There seemed to be nothing
forceful and fierce in his behavior; he was speaking with me (in not too many
words, possibly) and performing a ritual of some kind I also did not understand
but felt to be in a way-decisive. It seemed that I was neither elated nor
scared. But the memory of this seemingly not too significant dream kept
returning and returning to me. I never discussed anything about these experiences
with A.V. I still prefer to think of him as a superpsychocatalyst, who was not
even aware of these events, that, nevertheless, most likely had some connection
with Him. But, of course, this is a kind of most unscientific, non-falsifiable
speaking. By the way, later I learned, by a chance (?) experience, that sitting
in half-lotus position (I have never been able to reach full-lotus) enables one
to contain considerable energy. But most natural for this state turned out to
be "just sitting." (These words I learned a bit later and they
immediately made sense to me.) To return to the dream stories, what looks quite
silly is that I cannot answer the question whether or not I am initiated into
any esoteric tradition. One more "initiatory" story. During some years
when I was having pen contacts with followers of Dr. G. Bennett, a large hairy
bee once hit my lips, doing no harm. This was a synchronicity (these days I was
thinking of Beelzebub as the Lord of the Bees, and afraid of my own metaphor),
and very powerful as an experience: I was most scared and at the same time
exhilarated. For several months if not longer I was living in a new world
colored by this experience. Maybe one can introduce the expression "seed
initiation" for experiences of this kind that with favorable conditions
would have grown into something most valuable.
Earlier I suggested a concept of demonic intellectual energy in the
context of my second story and even a most fundamentalist "diabolic"
was certainly assumed. My experiential background does not enable me to be
quite definite in this point, but I have some more stories to tell, that indeed
seem to point towards the extremely negative metaphysical pole. At least my
visualizations of some forces were so special--at least psychologically--as
indeed to deserve this ancient label, or, to put it another way, as never to be
mistaken for anything else. But of course, seeing both with our physical eyes
or, say, with "eyes on some next levels" (according to the hierarchy
by Green and Green), one is hardly to dare to claim of seeing directly, at
least in the well-known Biblical sense. To say it still another way: our
ability to be misled by all kinds of illusions, on any levels, seems to be
unquestionably limitless.
With all these reservations, a report of an encounter "with forces
of evil" near summer Solstice follows. It was certainly a magical point to
the North from St. Petersburg. I was already happy with some control over third
eye functions in these days. The story took place during a very special day and
night: messages of Nature seemed to keep passing us—a quickly swimming serpent,
as if carrying out a special mission, and sea gulls that started circling over
a cloud of mist at the water-mill after midnight. In a special place-two trees
growing together--I hoped to see, using my recent abilities, something
romantic. What I really saw this midnight was something of rural lore, dizzying
monstrous creatures, maybe very ancient peasant culture "astral
companions," something extraordinary even when compared with my previous
"lower astral" experience . . . and as if this was not enough, in a
way there was a "bottom" of my strangely "many-layered"
view and in this bottom something absolutely 2-dimensional was in a constant
movement that felt much worse than all the "ancient rural"
monstrosity. The feeling of a very special panic, close to vomiting, and the
most real experience of a 2-dimensional state of something that unquestionably
felt like an extreme form of evil are still most alive in my memory. (Before
this experience anything like this was only an abstract idea, a strange mental
construction for me.) This memorable night, repeating and repeating the Jesus
prayer (a most helpful remedy one must not hesitate to use in the case of a
"metaphysical" danger), very slowly restored me to our consensus
world. There is one more thing about this story, a physical after-effect (maybe
an illusion, in fact a story of miraculous saving of my life) that I am
possibly to relate in a different place discussing a possible connection
between states of consciousness (energy states) and a concept of
"coincidences flow intensity," that I'll introduce in the last part
of this paper.
Now some brighter stories follow that comment
on my third story. I want to tell about the very special feeling after
overcoming all the limitations ... at least for a short time this was something
very special. First glimpse of this world was provided by a woman who passed
from yoga through occult to orthodox Christianity. It is a story from her
"occult period." When holding her hands near an old orthodox
Christian Icon she said: "Quite Holy, indeed." This sacrilegious
expression had a reality behind it and I discovered afterwards that this
feeling like a cool stream, as if a life-restoring slight cool wind around an
old Icon, and the feeling after overcoming one's ego (when it is done the
"right way," with a right purpose?)--are very closely related if not
the same.
My own story is a bit longer,
but I'll attempt to be as concise as possible. With several young men we were
playing fortune telling, maybe just (alas!) having a good time with a Bible.
Texts that fell to other people were more or less normal, but for me only very
harsh expressions followed one another. Young men looked to each other with
some surprise, nothing more, but I felt that I had been waiting for this moment
all my life and that by now my world, in a way, had collapsed. This was the
end. This was the Final Judgment. When other people turned to other activities
I quite mechanically, so I felt, took an old Icon, that was brought by a young
man, who started the game. I had a feeling that my inside in a way does not
exist, that I am an absolutely hollow man (hopelessly hollow). And then a very
cool life-providing current started passing me, from the Icon, through my hands
holding it—like a current of Water of Life in fairy tales (and like the stream
of energy resulting from overcoming ego resistances, or was this
correspondence an illusion created by my concepts ?).... No hope emerged,
but I was just sitting and sitting with no thoughts and the current just passed
and passed through me. I returned to my home afterwards and I cannot remember
any special" reactions of mine towards my family. My son is epileptic with
very serious mental retardation. I talked with him, played a bit, but I don't
remember doing anything special for him. A lot of time passed. And then, during
a serious quarrel, my (former) spouse told me: "To tell You the truth you
are a very bad human being, only once in your life have you been good ..."
and she named the day I am writing about here. (Her information about all the
story was minimal.) A quarrel possibly sometimes can help one to spot an
ultimate truth. And I understood that to be really good one needs to do
nothing, that it is the quality of being that makes the difference, and at the
same time, that two different cases of doing nothing special can be as
different as heaven and hell.
Alas, I have lost almost all the positive
results of the above stories. The first way to lose the fruits of one's
"right deeds" to use a Christianized expression from Buddhism is so
simple, so trivial, so fantastic (and so ridiculous). We trade our spiritual
achievements, "giving away" some spiritual potential of ours to get
rid of some real trouble or even for small comfort. (It is easier than to give
away a small coin.) I, for example, was very seldom able to resist a chance
"to stop" a bus so as to be the first one to enter. Quite often I
seemed to succeed and certainly from event to event, step-by-step (a small coin
after small coin) I gave something valuable away. At least this way it is
recorded in my memory. (In most cases I am not able to do it any more-no more
"coins". . . or am I now less neurotic (psychotic?), or simply try
too hard now?) Of course, you must know Leningrad's public transportation (and
preferably also to be able to believe some obvious crap) to understand me
fully ... (I would be most happy if this all would turn out to be nonsense,
indeed!). But, illusion or not (almost certainly in a "physical
sense" it is), it certainly speaks of a process of some kind of loss of my
"spiritual attainment," as recorded in my memory. And also, there are
stories made of seemingly weightless material of coincidences, but they seem to
measure your spiritual growth . . . they put you on trial and after more and
more stories of the same kind you can only give up (as I did). Indeed, there
seems to be a kind of spiritual law of conservation. (See works of Paracelsus
for some magical laws of conservation to understand the variety once felt
commonplace.) But this is possibly a theme of a separate treatise. In the next
two papers of this series (Soidla, 1995a, Soidla, 1995b) I'll attempt telling
of what has still remained with me. This is a rather different kind of story.
Returning to theory. Are we to take energy out of the concept of
energies? The laws that (possibly) shape our lives (nuovo cemento). Intensity
of coincidences flow. Heaven and Hell Revisited. They belong to large non-local
systems of membership. Stable and unstable "molecular antennae." An
attempt to name some reasonable numbers. What one is to get ready before one's
Death (and almost never succeeds). There are serious doubts about the metaphor of
energy in all the above speculations. I think that Professor Zbigniev Wolkowski
from The University of Paris VII was the first personality to shatter my naive
belief about the psychical energies as quite related to our concepts of
physical energy. (He certainly bears no responsibility for the ideas presented
in this paper of mine.) Alas, it is rather difficult to formulate any positive
concepts in this proto if not pseudoscientific (Soidla, 1993a) field. My
personal working hypothesis is that what we feel as different energies within
our body has something to do with a (seeming) potential (or intensity) of flow
of coincidences, maybe with a "master-of-coincidences"—a formative
force {or a family of formative forces) that shape our lives (if not to use the
old-fashioned word fate). One can suppose that this is something that as a
rule (at low intensities?) seems not to interfere with the stochastic
"normal science" world-devoid of any "meanings "-where it
is reasonable to suppose that A and В meet, and С sinks on the "Titanic," by chance only. I
would like to name this formative force as "nuovo cemento," but I do
know that specialists in physics do not like this kind of joke. (Anyway, I
already noted that certainly we have no science of objective description of
patterns of human life story even to attempt a serious study of these kinds of
synchronicities, illusions, self-fulfilling prophecies, or what?) But there is
the powerful metaphor of our nervous system! (Don't we have an intuition that
the "implicate order" of our reality is some way
nervous-system-like?) We have, or at least can develop, some feedback of neuron
firing, including the will-driven one, when individual neuron firings are quite
obviously no more independent. For a short period the world of neuron firing is
no more stochastic! It can be so even in the absence of any physical activity!
(Of course, different groups of neurons can provide quite different kind of
feelings one can learn to recognize.) As in a human body, in a world with will
and love and prayer and meditation, there are periods when in the background of
stochastic combinations of events some special, meaningful, at least for a
given personality, obviously more than just stochastic coincidences turn out to
be possible. (I know the human power to perceive some kind of apparent order
in a quite stochastic field, to read some kind of post-factum order into one's
data. I have caught myself in these kinds of mistakes when working in my field
of science. We are so used to taking the stochastic hypothesis when the system
looks too complicated (and seemingly not worth) to be analyzed, like a human
life story. Do You remember the words : "Mere coincidences ? Maybe. But I
do know, that when I pray they do occur, and when I don't—it seems they
don't." (Sorry, I forgot the source.) Certainly, some more people than the
author of these words can subscribe to this illusion. A mere illusion? Maybe
all this is worth a second look?)
Is one allowed to suppose that different "planes" like astral,
mental, causal, etc., have some reality behind them—and some forces (of a
psycho-physical world) stabilizing these "planes"? Maybe building
special associative memory engrams by different repetitive patterns of our
behavior we build our "bodies" for action in these abstract realms.
Can it be so that our "fate," our remembrance of future things, our
unedited memory, is in fact pre-edited by our high abstraction level
associative memory engrams? Then "coincidences" are real bits of new
patterns of our recently rewritten new chapters of life story and this
rewriting function for more or less distant times to come is a kind of creator
of our "karma." This means that some generalizations of our actions
are possibly quite literally written down in our associative memory creating a
weak but stable (never ceasing) pressure (almost?) inevitably influencing our
future actions (life situations that we are likely to confront). Can these
"seeds" of our karma, the simple repetitive structure memory engrams
even communicate through the spatial and temporal borders (Soidla, 1993с)? Is one allowed to suppose a dualism of memory and
consciousness mirroring causal connections so that compulsive (vicious) circles
of consciousness created by one's actions are crystallized to memory creating
new circles of consciousness to create new memories ? Are there even some extra
possibilities of connection between the spatial "cells" of our
Universe (say, Quarks) so that they can behave like neurons in some cases that
our organism can understand? Do there exist the rules of morphic resonance
brilliantly defended by R. Sheldrake (1987) ? I don't know! (Illegitimate
questions, irresponsible answers . . . returning and returning.) And still I am
rather sure that we have some extra-corporeal substitute for neuron firing
pattern biofeedback working both locally and in non-local ensembles. Maybe it
is some sensitivity to any aspects of nearby molecular interaction patterns,
for lower level "psychical fields"; possibly we can speak of "feeling
tone guides" connecting us with these patterns (Gray, 1979; LaViolette,
1979). Maybe it would be useful to speak of the STYLE of our invisible
non-local ensemble. (We do know how sensitive we are to the style and mode
aspects of social life on a common level!) . . . . N.B.! The above does not
necessarily have anything to do with a capacity to perform any gross physical
actions. It can be just an ability to make quiet and peaceful some region
around a body, to participate in a surge of love and ecstasy at Christmas, etc.
. . .1 might add, that quite traditionally "lower" energies are
considered not to be limited by a physical body, but nevertheless, to be mostly
local, of a form of "sheaths." Starting with the really transpersonal
levels, "the energy fields" obtain the possibility to operate with
non-local ensembles. Starting with this level we are not the sole operators of
these forces, rather voices in a Chorus. According to a most popular belief,
indeed, all of us belong to one of the non-local bodies of collective action.
(Maybe one would prefer another word, say, system.) Membership in these bodies
of a psycho-physical world is determined by our behavior: by our free will
actions, love, etc. (but a short-term membership mediated by words or even
certain chemicals is also possible). I have argued in a different place
that this membership is physically mediated by short repetitive RNA
molecules (associative memory engrams) in our nervous system as a result of
certain actions (Soidla, 1993a, 1993с).
To return to the membership bodies, certainly Heaven and Hell can be
names of two of these bodies, but possibly we can attempt other (dualistic or
non-dualistic) ways of counting and naming. One can suggest a model
according to which four different all-pyrimidine dinucleotides UU, CC, UC or CU
can be followed by oligoC or oligoU sequences. One can consider repetitive
triplets consisting of pyrimidines only. In both cases one gets 8 different
repetitive RNA molecules that can correspond to the 6 realms of existence of
Buddhism plus, say, a Buddha realm (plus a Mara realm?). Eight different high
abstraction level associative memory engrams is also enough to allow membership
in 7 "planes" (+ 1 extra one) according to the SLM model discussed
earlier in this paper. In addition some other small molecules can be reversibly
added to any of these near-homopolymeric RNA molecules that determine our
membership in the above mentioned cosmic (if one likes this word) bodies. For
example, two different "caps" (modified nucleotides in the beginning
of the molecule) can provide reversible negative or positive color to one's
experience. Of course, these are only some possible realizations of our
principal model (Soidla, 1993b), an example of possible "molecular
games" opened by the model. (For more serious consideration of the
biochemistry involved one can consult (Watson et al. [1987]). As many
traditions tell us, one of the above mentioned realms (according to the
accumulated "karma") is to be the Reality we are to wake into after finishing
our existence here in our consensus reality; at the same time this everyday
reality of ours can be considered as a still non-obligatory,
dream-participation in these membership bodies. Many readers of this paper can
possibly share with the author a feeling of some fundamental mistakes in our
attitudes towards the precious gift of our life as human beings. Maybe You also
feel that we are possibly near some "waterfall," I do not know how to
name it, and after passing it we 'II have no control, but maybe we can still
retain emotions and some intellect. It feels so different from the less
personal statement on the same effect above. I would ask readers to share some
silence with me having followed me to this point. There are some more words in
the synopsis of this section. But I feel that I cannot continue any more. I
leave it to You to find better words to end this paper. I feel that finding
these words is a most important task for us. We are all living together in the
world these days with some most important unfinished business.
Some final remarks. I must certainly add that some ideas along the lines
of the previous section have been proposed earlier (Greidanus, 1972, 1975).
Also I must admit that my model (Soidla, 1992, 1993a, 1993b) is possibly good
only for showing that transpersonal considerations can serve as guidelines to
predict something tangible, something that can be possibly found and studied in
a living cell one day. For me it is also a friendly nightmare of a contemporary
King Midas in whose hands even transpersonal material is transformed into a
molecular model. Nevertheless, I hope that the readers of this treatise have
noted that I tried to share not only self-confident attempts of answers, but
also some inquisitive questions of mine. Maybe I should also add that some
lines of this article are to be further developed in the second and third parts
of this paper (Soidla, 1995a, 1995b).
There is a popular mystical idea of the world being contained within the
mind (as an illusion) or of a world as construction or simulation. These ideas
allow one to take at its face value what I have said about the coincidences
flow, but possibly these metaphors
are too powerful and one is to pay too much for
subscribing to these ideas; too much seems to be possible in a world like this.
Is there anything that has remained limited and predictable? Or is one to learn
more, if not rules then rules of rules (including rules of conservation) in
psychology? Is the World really an illusion of the Great Mind—or a kind of
Memory of this Mind? Can studying Memory tell us something important about the
most general properties of our world (or even properties common to our world
and some other realms of existence)? A too romantic idea, to say the least,
but who knows, one day. . . .
To sum up: what is the main attempted message
of this paper, of all these personal stories and speculations? I would ask you
to ponder once more on the old hypothesis, that I would formulate the following
way: Real life situations have a complementary description in terms of
"energies" (of different "levels" and/or connected with
different "planes") that are perceived by a majority of people, but
most often subliminally, and in this case they have a basis in our addiction to
some kind of situations, to some quite irrational ways of behavior. At the same
time, conscious attention to these "energies"—as to something quite
real-can help one to better handle some kinds of (at least psychologically)
dangerous real life situations. Maybe one is even allowed to suppose that some
special associative memory clusters (and corresponding associative memory
engrams) can be involved as a basis of experiencing these energies. A feeling
of a kind of natural hierarchy of these energies can then lead one to suppose a
corresponding hierarchy of associative memory clusters and a hierarchy of real
life situations (and one's ways of behavior in these situations), a rather
direct perception of a possibility of one's life story ascending towards
transpersonal dimensions.
"What am I really longing
for . . . for a fruit of science, or for a flower of spirit? I want to pick the
flower, but end with empty hands; there is really no flower, only a flow of
something I cannot name. NO FLOWER, NO FRUIT, ONLY A FLOW THROUGH.
REFERENCES
Blake, W. (1967). The marriage of Heaven and
Hell. (Introduction and commentaries
by Sir Geoffrey Keynes.)
London: Oxford University Press. (Commentaries on
plates 1-27)
Crampton, M. (1974). Psychological energy
transformations: Developing positive
polarization. Journal of
Transpersonal Psychology. 6, 39-56.
Gray, W. (1979). Understanding the creative
thought process: An early formulation of
emotional-cognitive structure
theory. Man-Environment Systems. 9, 3-13.
Green, E. E., & Green, A. M. (1971). On the
meaning of transpersonal: Some
metaphysical perspectives. Journal
of Transpersonal Psychology. 3, 27-46.
Greidanus, J. H. (1972). The psycho-physical
nature of reality. Transactions of the
Netherlands Royal
Academy of Sciences. 1st Series. 26 (4), 5-55.
Greidanus, J. H. (1975). Psycho-physical theory
(improved). Proceedings of the
Netherlands Royal
Academy of Sciences, Series B, 78. 1-37.
LaViolette, P. A. (1979). Thoughts about
thoughts about thoughts: The
emotional-perceptive cycle
theory. Man-Environment Systems. 9, 15-47.
Sakharov, В. (1993). Opening
of the third eye (theory and practice of clairvoyance).
Meditatio (Presa Ukrainy,
Kiev), 1, 7-69. (In Russian)
Sheldrake, R. (1987). A new science of life:
The hypothesis of formative causation (2nd ed.).
London: Collins.
Soidla, T. R. (1992). Schroedinger's cat in Pandora's box. Twelfth
International
Transpersonal Association
Conference (Prague) Abstracts, p. 10.
Soidla, T. R. (1993a). Morphic resonance, molecular structure, and man:
Some
metaphysics. International
Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 12(2), 51-55.
Soidla, T. R. (1993b)). A RNA-editing based model of memory. Folia
Baeriana. 6,
261-268.
Soidla, T. R. (1993с). Biological texts
and spiritual values. Revival of Russian
Religious Philosophical
Thought (Proceedings of the International Conference,
March 22-24, 1993). St.
Petersburg: Glagol, pp. 25-29.
Soidla, T. R. (1995a). Open mouth, open mind: An impressionistic attempt
at a
transpersonal autobiography,
Part 2. Living and losing with high energies.
International Journal of
Transpersonal Studies. 14, Supplement, 43-59.
Soidla, T. R. (1995b)). Open mouth, open mind: An impressionistic
attempt at a
transpersonal autobiography.
Part 3. Transpersonal fox speaking in a trap or how
I was cornered. Out managed
not to make the necessary conclusions. Manuscript
in preparation.
Watson, J. D., Hopkins, N. H., Roberts, J. W., Steitz, J. A., &
Weiner, A. M.
(1987). Molecular biology
of the gene (Vol. 1, 4th ed.). Menlo Park, CA:
Benjamin /Cummings.
OPEN MOUTH, OPEN MIND:
AN IMPRESSIONISTIC ATTEMPT OF A TRANSPERSONAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY
Part 2. Living and losing with high energies
T. R. Soidla
A very personal introduction. This is once more a
collection of stories of the kind one usually does not speak about.
My stories are generally rather simple and describe
everyday life situations, only a bit shifted (and maybe “enhanced”)
by my attempts at esoteric consciousness training [and
maybe also “edited” by the labors of recollection].
Most likely they make more sense in a metaphysical
than in a physical framework. My certainly quite controversial
point is that “usually never narrated stories” like these
can provide some material for pondering over possible
outlines of a “psycho-physical” science of tomorrow.
Here I attempt some preliminary classification, and try to
discuss some most obvious ties of this “suppressed”
realm of experience with traditional “transpersonal psychologies”
and metaphysical systems. As a result, these papers of
mine are just a bit pre-selected garbage heaps (or
would you prefer an image of a stand of an old man
selling various kinds of old crap on a street) for people who
prefer to search for some valuable things in places
like these. In other words, this is some quite raw material
presented here in search for a real author to discover
the meaning of all this (and to tell me). This second heap of
stories is mostly concerned with physical
manifestations of different states of consciousness, from rather subtle to
rather gross ones, much more controversial material
than my first selection that was concerned with experiencing
different “energies.” Once more I would like to stress
here my conviction, that a garbage heap (made of of all the
personal stories one does not usually tell to other
people, of laboratory lore and irreproducible results in science,
of irrational behavior, etc.) is
quite likely a better place to find some (alchemists’) Gold than a
regular mine (of
raw data). It is my opinion, that a garbage pile
company has usually saved a lot of most interesting things (that
possibly lie behind a silent service gate somewhere in
the next corridor after the last door kept open for lay visitors--
the door for cartoonists, keepers of Peter’s
Principle, and other brave jokers at the Wall of Unknown). It
is
with these risky metaphors in mind that I give you a
friendly offer of all the personal stories in this paper (smelling--
if not foul--then certainly a bit “fool”). I
must to stress here also that there is one line of argumentation that
occupies a rather special place with me. My attempts
at “transpersonal” papers may be sometimes a bit autobiographical,
even a bit “[pseudo]science-like,” but what is a
“must” for all of them is not a theory (or practice) of
consciousness (as some titles would probably suggest),
but rather a series of speculations about the bearing of
some not well understood Dance(s) of
Consciousness--including Memory, Mystical states, Transpersonal
experience(s) etc.--upon the Structure of
Macromolecules. Maybe you just do not like to speak of molecules,
especially macromolecules, when Spiritual matters are
considered? O.k. But do you agree, that the macromolecules
are the building blocks you and I and all other human
beings are made of? If o.k., then can you feel yourself
a Chief of a Tribe of Macromolecules? Not? It is still
o.k. Such exotic feelings are not needed to agree with me,
although the above is possibly a good spiritual game.
But You know, that in the world, where we speak, teach,
preach, read spiritual texts (for example on Zen
koans), a written text can carry (and communicate) meaning--
sometimes even an uncommunicable one. And now remember
the genetical information written down in our DNA
(more than 109 symbols are needed for this). Can You
be sure that special macromolecules carrying (and mediating)
spiritual values are not a most natural way even for
our transpersonal level book-keeping? Another question is
how to make the book-keeping safe for both Time and
Eternity. I have noted that a process like the most controversial
morphic resonance (Sheldrake, 1987) one is possibly a
complementary factor needed for this. These macromolecules
. . . . Of course, represent a kind of primitive
materialism (not to mention about the dialectical variety
that has mostly damaged our country), an orientation
that has done a lot to make it disgusting to think along these
lines. But there were times when theological thinking
grew directly into physical theories that at least by now seem
so very materialistic. And so it is: If Metaphysics
escapes being caught by our Scientific Method nets, it keeps
playing with us, inspiring and often communicating
profound metaphysical truths in shockingly materialistic
forms. “Molecules of heredity” were a shock for many
clever people . . . We are right to repeat, that Eternity is in
love with the productions of Time, that at least the
Individual Consciousness is (in our consensus reality) certainly
in love with the Material World (or purusha with
prakriti, if one prefers it this way), that Jesus loved not only
Mary, but also her sister Martha. But, to return to my
own experience, of course, a Love story is not often a story of
happiness (You have only to ask Your
grand-grandmother!). This story is about Failure.
Living with failure is not easy, but it can be quite a
rewarding experience. This paper is certainly intended to
discuss the rewards, but the hazards involved are also
to get a fair (some of you may well think an exaggerated)
treatment. If I can keep following the Feeling Tone
that seems to reach me time and again this is to be mostly a
paper about HOPE.
Meaning or manipulation, an important choice. The
psycho-physical worlds: Making a XXth century Mystic.
Integral (feedback) evaluations of coincidences flow
as a “feeling tone.” Possibly there are only few bodies operating
with coincidences (or is it better to speak of
“styles”?). How to live in the speaking (beating, biting . . . etc.)
world? Teaching stories of the everyday life. Of a
realistic attitude towards (some) very negative experience. The
Boeing taking off, or “in extreme situations one knows
better, maybe . . . .” Not too often one seems to notice a
basic existential choice: to get meaning or to
manipulate. One can read his or her life story (or at least some key
episodes of it) as a personal book of teachings. This
is labeled by many of us as a passive, Eastern, and certainly
quite an old-fashioned attitude. Or one can take an
alternative (active, Western, and still modern) attitude of “making”
one’s own life story, of predicting and manipulating
the stream of events. This is as true for esoteric studies as
for any other human activity. Sometimes it feels that
the real alternative is: to be manipulated [as if manipulated]
by a kind of Numinous source (Great Mind, Collective
[un]consciousness--and to get MEANING, or to manipulate--
and to get the FRUIT of one’s action. Maybe any [both
individual or even civilization-wide] forcing or
blocking of the natural flow of meaning can result in
the “dark night of the soul” or in being taken aback by a
sudden painful torrent of teaching [of meaning] one
day. This hypothetical dynamics of meaning and manipulation
is implied as a general background of this paper of
mine.
There is a story in one of the huge novels by Dumas
about an incredible chain of coincidences that results in a
death that no one is seemingly guilty of. The last
words of the story make the point: here in the East we are Masters
of Coincidences. Most of my readers know that J. Lilly
(1973) and J. Greidanus (1961, 1972, 1975) have included
coincidences as a part of a unmistakably Western
(albeit controversial) World View. For me a most important thing
is that the philosophy of the two twentieth century
thinkers is individualistic, not too optimistic, and not manipulative.
(Nothing like the very sense of adventure pursued by
Dumas and possibly culminating at the first decades of
our century.) Here History itself seems to have (once
more?) entered the field of Esoteric and modified it. I have a
feeling that the two world wars (or is it the rise and
fall of totalitarian states) have closed a certain technocratic line
in high quality European esoteric thinking. We had
enough “charismatic murderers” as leaders of the most powerful
countries to realize at least some fatal limitations
of a certain variety of a mystical approach. What was left was
Individualism looking wide-eyed to the still seducing
but quite different dances of “energies” (or is one to say
prakriti?). I have a feeling that
mystical experience, at least among intellectuals (philosophers) is coupled now
with an astute sense of needing a personal failure,
that must not be dramatized, that must be integrated, etc.--but
that must be present. (Maybe it was quite consciously
taken as coupled only from WW1 to some time after WW2,
now it seems to be changing, but still working...
below the surface. Of course, a statement like this is difficult to
prove. To get some feeling of what I mean, one can
compare the enchanting autobiographical papers and books of
the Heroes of the transpersonal scene of ’60s with
their subsequent life stories, raising no more feelings of reverent
reverie but just some surge of compassion and
understanding!). So I am talking about some implicit sense that goes
contrary to almost any accepted psychological theory
of the last decades. Maybe there is a better way to tell it, but
there is something one has to pay from the totality of
his or her life (in most cases one is not ready, one is
forced...but one must be able!). Anyway, following--volens
nolens--this new thread some very refined powers,
some “masters of coincidences” entered the life of the
heroes of our time and taught remarkable, albeit in longrange
maybe quite unexpected lessons. My one failure is
considered in a rather abstract form here. For more
concrete details see the following part of this paper
(Soidla, 1995b). Here I would add some more words about a
most remarkable man whose name I just used. (I would
prefer seeing him as one of the “Judges Penitent” of this
century who received a rare gift of some basic very
clear formulations. I should not perhaps repeat his name here
to allow for some “creative uncertainty”). Alas, maybe
part of his specific failure is that no one seems to want to
listen to what he is saying. From this point I’ll try
to follow a risky path. My guess is that my particular (“permanent”)
failure is being forever a pseudo-specialist (in
spite of my formally quite normal professional reputation in
my country). The question
is, if I can be of any use in the search for truth even as a pseudo (that can,
of course, be
just a kind of special illusion for personal use
hiding an even more serious problem). Whatever the problem in my
case, I love the story about cunning invalids: the one
with no legs sitting on a shoulders of the one with no eyes,
etc., etc. Maybe these “transpersonal” papers of mine
are an attempt to find some people of my own fate and to try
myself the invalid trick of the above teaching story.
Maybe even it is the very time for some other “mystical invalids”
of my generation to start attempts of reaching
together the new truth that is not available for us as individual
beings. Maybe “bootstrapping” in physics is a concept
related to this . . . . Anyway, one cannot resist the temptation
to make newer and newer attempts towards reaching the
“wholeness mind” to integrate subjective and objective
experience (Rudhyar, 1983). Isn’t this quite natural,
quite human?
In one of his first transpersonal related works,
Greidanus (1961) tells of a beautiful imaginary experiment with an
observer in a nervous system, who most of the time has
a feeling of a very materialistic, predictable world around.
Background level firing of neurons is low, and what is
most important--quite stochastic. And then the Giant man
comes to making a decision--for example--to raise his
hand. For the imaginary inner observer (who sits favorably
in the part of CNS involved) this is a moment of
Singularity--firing of different neurons is no longer stochastic,
showing definite, very intricate patterns linking
distant events--and then it is once more a quiet, predictable stochastic
World. And a main idea behind all that was told is
that we see in the above story just antics of Consciousness,
and even more, that possibly Consciousness is not
connected with the nervous system only, but with any
system that is complicated enough. Greidanus presented
the idea of his “psycho-physical world” afterwards in a
better, more adequate way. But in a way the original
story and first formulations contained some trace of future
science that was possibly lost in more refined and
more “normal” later attempts. What I take from this story is just
the possibility of unpredictable (for the
observer--certainly irreproducible), sometimes rather large scale (and most
often quite short time) violations of stochastics with
no visible connection to any human reach. They are due to
Consciousness organizing ensembles of events linked
with channels that look rather fantastic for our conditioned
mind. [Maybe even the Plenum of World(s)--that are
ultimately contained in our consciousness/memory--has been
“formatted” to allow for some special effects of the
above kind--a most crazy remark, and to remain a crazy
remark for at least many tens of years, but maybe not
forever?] Is it not a common intuition, that we have (or can
be trained to have) “biofeedback” for this
extra-corporeal action of consciousness, that we can be trained to feel a
consciousness (or special consciousness level) flow in
a Space connected this way or other with our Mind/Body
(including even “nonlocal ensembles”) as a certain
Energy? We can feel both “intensity” and some characteristics
(“level”) of this consciousness as different levels
and grades of “energy.” This means, that my idea, that perceiving
“energies” is really a perception of an intensity of
coincidences flow (Soidla, 1995a), is not so different from the
concept of Tart (1975) of awareness/ attention as
“energy.” Here I have called your attention to the fact that focusing
awareness/attention means changing synaptically
regulated neuron firing (“coincidences”) patterns in CNS
(that is possibly what we really perceive) and that
maybe we can extend this idea to some other (say, still hypothetical
but seemingly promising microtubule computing [Hameroff,
1987]) levels in both the human body, and
maybe even to the world at large. Once more, in some
cases, as we know about biofeedback, we can use our will to
influence the outcome. This means, of course, that we
automatically take responsibility for our action at both trivial
and possibly also some “profound” level. This last
step--from CNS to the world behind body limits--is exactly
what we are not allowed to do by our contemporary
scientific world view, but let’s pretend that the border is not
here--just to push the metaphor to its extreme limits,
where it seems at least to grow rather helpful for organizing
one’s personal experience. Maybe we must not be even
too scared doing this: not all of the “sacred borders”
remain constant during the history of science. But
certainly we must be conscious of doing a really “forbidden
thing”! It may feel rather wild to ask
HOW MANY different MASTERS OF COINCIDENCES govern (or can
enter) our life. Really, most spiritual traditions
have asked just this question, but in different wording. In the above
example, for the observer, there exists one source of
coincidences--the Giant Man. This was a specially constructed
example, of course. Christian thinking would also
suppose one main source of coincidences--the GOD, who is
counteracted by, in a way weaker, but practically most
active and troublesome negative contradictor(s). There are
dualistic religions (like Manicheanism) that seem to
propose two main sources. I should like to propose, that there
are impersonal sources of coincidences and that the
Buddhistic six realms are quite real attractors--masters-ofcoincidences
governing one’s life. Are these realms a kind of dream
state after death, if one of them has grown
sufficiently predominant in your Psyche, as even
Hamlet (and Shakespeare) seem to suggest? Who knows . . . . In a
previous paper of mine (Soidla, 1995a) I have noted
that possibly there exist eight different near-homopolymer
RNA molecules--small very fundamental associative
memory clusters created by our actions that link us to nonlocal
bodies of spiritual nature, invisible collectives,
that act as attractors for corresponding levels of coincidences
flow. If my counting is reasonable, I suppose that 6
bodies are given to 6 realms of existence--some reasonable
approximation to the Buddhist realms. Of the two
remaining ones--ONE that is most difficult to reach leads to the
GOD/G-d/Buddha realm (One is said to be able to reach
Buddhahood in any of the six realms. Buddha is different
and above these 6 realm-attractors). And one more of
the 8 bodies possibly belongs to the negative Legion/Mara,
to a [collective] Negative God, or something like this
maybe the image in Christianity is contaminated by some
minor (for us), alien, bee-swarm-like attractor
converted to Negative by our xenophobia. Any speculations like the
above one are highly intuitive, to say the least. I
can only hope, that the molecular metaphor advocated here can be
of some use to further discussions on metaphysical and
transpersonal “cartography.” What one must certainly
remember is that the concept of seven chakras is only
indirectly linked to the above “molecular ethics” (of course,
I must stress once again that such arguments are on an
intuitive level).
The following is about PRACTICE . . . and certainly is
to sound rather controversial to put it quite mildly. But it is
something bearing on the core message of this paper.
Just an illusion? Possibly yes . . . . One can read meaning into
stochastic events! But at the same time the
controversial “mind-over-matter effects,” physical anomalies related to
consciousness, are materialized just in stochastic
processes, as the most careful numerous experiments by Jahn and
Dunne (1987) seem to tell us. And then, maybe it is
your illusion also? Have you passed days and weeks when
seemingly all the world is speaking with you? And the
feeling of unique “style” and high intensity of all the coincidences
. . . . You need not even ask questions in any
articulated form. You just think of something and everything in
the Nature seems to be eager to answer you. In a city
you can have a secret code of passing cars’ number plates.
You can ask any book--even a dictionary. You invent
the rules of asking the question. Nature is answering the
question and when you repeat the question you can get
the same, often shocking answer in different “wording.”
Your everyday explanation-away habit seems to be
overloaded and paralyzed. Are these indeed the days of high
density coincidences flow? I would like to say
something like this, but obviously one is not to take one’s first
opinion too seriously. (I hope to be able to write
down my own experience along these lines in more detail one day.
Of course, it is difficult to communicate the most
elusive meaning of one’s games with car numbers, how could it
continuously grow so convincing . . . a continuous
real-time Rorschach test with feedback, possibly, but sometimes
SO elaborate and convincing. Or some years of
companionship with a Japanese dictionary . . . . I converted
Russian names of my friends to Japanese syllables,
combined them in to short “words” and searched for a meaning
in a dictionary. I was careful to consult the
dictionary only when I needed some help, some guidance with my
relationships. The answers were cynical and up to a
point, a Rorschach on the level of interpretation once more,
possibly, but so cutting through my problems,
sometimes. With one quite elaborate answer, nevertheless, I never
could really agree, alas, I must admit, that I
certainly enjoyed it. For a man whom I most admired I got a “diagnosis”:
a hollow man. I tried once more with different
combination of syllables and got “INDEED, ONLY a straw.”
All this was personally impressive, but certainly a
bit ambiguous concerning the LEVEL of communication. The
“dialogue” felt rather intelligent [clever], friendly
[not aggressive], was never really predictive [by the way, the
rather “transparent” straw=Cain symbolism also never
worked], but left a feeling of important [pleasant, a bit
“astral club talk”-like] exchange.) And,
indeed, one is likely to grow most interested if not exactly in WHO is
speaking to him, then at least about the LEVEL of the dialogue.
Suppose that you discover that the answers seem
to be painful, give rise to negative emotions. Then
you can suppose that you are crazy . . . or that you have contacted
“lower astral,” or “demonic forces,” something like
this, and most likely after some time you’ll think only
about leaving the game. But can you be sure that any
higher level dialogue must sound emotionally neutral and at
least not to be painful? C. S. Lewis has noted that
pain is a megaphone of God. If you find some truth in this (and a
Christian is most likely to be inclined to agree) You
must be able to tell involvement from manipulation. By the
fruits You’ll know Him. Also You must be very careful
about your own hidden motives. Did you really need an
answer, or did you just want to be scared. Certainly
you could just get what you were asking for . . . . It can need
all your life to be able to discriminate some
intricate illusion. But there can be rather simple cases, say, the above
mentioned “lower astral” level of Mind (Green & Green,
1971) that aims at maximal emotional response and
leaves you in a worse and worse condition, or all the
“answers” being boring and primitive. Then indeed it is
better to search for some help, maybe even medical
help (by the way, my rather limited personal experience tells
me that common sense and sense of humor can be best
helpers in even most “crazy” situations.) But suppose that
it is not so and you feel perhaps some personal
growth, some increase of meaning in your life. Nice. But at least I
would discourage any attempts of obtaining practically
useful information this way. Your “partner” [acting in or via
your Mind] even in the best case has His/Her/Its own
concept (algorithm) of these contacts. In practice you can
have some 100% correct predictions followed by a
splendid (that, alas, means most shocking) failure. It is not a
game to satisfy your appetites! And after some more
attempts, possibly you return to religious prescriptions as a
more practical thing. In the best case you will be
growing to begin seeing in Your exchange with Nature (“Great
Mind”) not some informative but some other--possibly
Generative purposes. There can be special cases, but I
suppose I am speaking here of the usual scheme of
these contacts at the masters of coincidences level.
Am I to add that the world seems to be not only
speaking with you but also beating or even biting in a rather
meaningful way. Many of my readers certainly have some
experience with “transpersonal” lovely hitting--when
needed. Of course, when one’s thinking is obsessed and
starts going round and round in circles, one gets insensitive
to the real environment and quite easily can slip or
stumble against a piece of furniture or hit one’s head. A
good piece of feedback, often helping to return to
normality, but one needs no Great Mind to explain this. But
sometimes a setting of these kind of experiences is so
elaborate as to make one sometimes doubt any simple
explanations. I was much impressed by the following
story. I had a nasty thought about Shambhala and suddenly
had a feeling that THIS TIME the precious GIFT of
PUNISHMENT is to follow very soon. (It was a time of some
Spiritual Ascent with me these years and many of you
know [or have an illusion] that it means also quick physical
punishment feedback when needed.) I left home with my
epileptic son for a short walk. A dog approached us
quickly. Carefully passing my son he silently bit my
leg and left the scene. I had a feeling of looking to all this as if
from some distance. It occurred in a context of
“magical time” when meaningful coincidences seemingly kept
piling up. Whatever the mechanism of these
coincidences, they certainly can create a situation of personal and
transpersonal growth. The Indian notion that sometimes
everything can function as one’s Guru seems to be relevant
here. If a teaching situation is created, then every
triviality seems to be involved in teaching you. Would it be
wiser to label it an illusion and to waste these
unique opportunities? Certainly, one is not likely to refute the
baseline (stochastic) explanation with experiences
like these. But the baseline concept (like the “nothing-butness”
noticed by Frankl, 1969) itself is quite
mobile, as the history of science teaches us, and certainly this concept
already feels quite different in at least some altered
states of consciousness (say, when all the world seems to be
your Guru). The following story of the world as a
teacher sounds a bit like the “hunches” in the charming book by
Heywood (1966). A minor but quite important difference
is that if hunches are perceived as a kind of warning to
help me or other people (I have also experienced
something like this several times), the following story was perceived
in a unmistakable teaching context. I was sitting in a
bus and suddenly I had a very insistent feeling that I
am to stand up. It looked crazy, everyone was sitting
on his seat, no one seemed to need this gesture of mine. And
then a very old woman quickly stood up to mark her
ticket, the bus turned and she tried to grab for some support in
vain. It was a wonder, that she was not injured as a
result. Had I been standing, my hand would have saved her
from some moments of most intensive panic, of
unnecessary suffering (and maybe, I could have paid an important
“karmic debt”, to tell it even more unscientifically,
but--for many of us--rather meaningful way). Here I am to
note
that when speaking not of other creatures but of
oneself, even the most painful and negative experiences are not of
an Absolute nature . . . in a sense that they can be
converted to positive ones. In a previous paper of mine (Soidla,
1995a) I related two stories, one from W. Blake (most
likely based on his own experience) and the other one by
myself. It needs some special in-depth consideration,
but as a working hypothesis I suggested in the paper that the
negative and positive character of one’s experience (if
not always, then at least often) is not immanent to the
experience, but added independently as a label. This
stresses a role of memory in painful experience and possibly
not a basic but rather applied role of most negative
(maybe even of extremely painful) and positive (maybe including
most forms of ecstatic) experience. In various
traditions, teachers warn against taking ecstatic experiences as a
proof of real spiritual growth. Most likely, at the
transpersonal level, both NEGATIVE and POSITIVE are an aid to
Memorize, to express Importance, rather than to classify
experience as metaphysically GOOD or BAD (not to say
anything more here about occasional and even
misleading labels). But this is a working hypothesis only, and one
that I would not hurry to put to extensive test in my
own life. There is a lot of first-class philosophy around this
problem. Transpersonal psychology has been often
accused in taking a rather one-sided, only positive experience
oriented stand as far as all the existential problems
(on the very border of suicide) are concerned. I would like to
deny some of the most grim varieties of
philosophy--together with transpersonalists and on the basis of my own
experiences. I don’t need to subscribe to a framework
that allows one to see all the most pessimistic dimensions
and applications of one’s life experience, a nice
game, but . . . . But I feel that it is better not to be too categorical
with all the stories and hypotheses of mine . . .
taking into account my beginner’s level of spiritual development
(including my own most limited ability to cope with
negative experiences; they are so easy to forget in quiet intervals,
but, in a sense, are still here, just around the next
corner) and, certainly, the gross humiliating lessons of the
XXth century.
By now I have told quite a lot about something surfacing
that seems not to be usually [constantly] present in our
lives. I have a metaphor for this. Air is so thin, so
intangible, that most of the time we just do not think about it.
(What is also true is that our life is impossible
without this intangible presence.) And now some athletics. Quicker,
quicker . . . now you feel air as something more and
more solid. And at something like 500 m.p.h. the thin air as a
roaring Genie is carrying a 400,000 kg plane (maybe
also a copy of this paper of mine). Frankl (1969), in his most
remarkable book about the concentration camp, told
about inmates’ fear of making decisions, of their obsession of
letting fate take its own course. It seems that the
concentration camp prisoners had an overwhelming feeling of
being a part of a larger context, of a reality of
ones’ fate, of some personally meaningful fatal coincidences flow
having its own rules and logic. Was it really only an
illusion created by the pressure of only too real hazards, or
just a penetration to the very rules of human life
made clear and tangible in these extreme conditions?
Some speculative thoughts about CHAKRAS as devices
connecting us with different extra-corporeal “ensembles.”
A rather doubtful story of Macromolecules articulating
their Philosophy: My carte blanche. Real speaking is silent
even with plants. On “levels” and men. Hands at
controls: Colors and syllables. Close encounters at the controls of
the WORLD: Your gift is your test . . . or so it
feels. The Helicopter Metaphor. Of the ultimate hazard. Beyond the
Boeing and Babel metaphors. Possibly “mutations” at
the “psychical energy levels” can teach some lessons. For
me it seems sometimes quite ironical that Mandalas and
Chakras (Arguelles & Arguelles, 1972; Green & Green,
1971; Leadbeater, 1971) have not found any place in
mainstream science so obsessed by symmetries. Maybe
“soft,” psychology-mediated symmetries seem to be of a
different world and so devoid of the intellectual challenge
of tangible crystals or of solid fact and good mathematics
based theoretical constructs. Every one really has what
he or she wants. I have some
most controversial and still quite nebulous general ideas about this point. I
consider it
most likely that our brain contains rather a small
number of types of memory retrieval complexes (Soidla, 1993b)
that differ by their symmetry, one type for every main
region of the brain. So I suppose that traditional forms of
chakras can rather accurately represent the overall
symmetry of a memory retrieval apparatus in the corresponding
regions of the brain. (I do not consider here any
possible direct effects connected with the traditionally alleged loci
of Chakras and the corresponding areas of the physical
body. They may exist, perhaps, as a further development of
the most hypothetical “model.”) At the same time, our
mind seems to be connected to several but not too many
systems [levels] of extra-corporeal coincidences flow that
seem to grow from something quite imperceptible (in our
usual state) to rather tangible, then real and then
overwhelming in the worlds of intensive experience--as discussed
with the Boeing metaphor. These systems
of extra-corporeal coincidences flow one can feel to be related to various
associative memory clusters--different
near-homopolymer RNAs of the brain. So different levels of coincidences
flow seem to be connected to different chakras.
And now, some most controversial “practical” notes
that are to resonate with different parts of this paper, and
which lead to an important point I need to make. Up to
some level, mastery of coincidences is backed by some
kind of mechanical devices (we can also say by
inflexible rules). The problem of the magical use of this mastery,
that was possibly discovered a very long time ago
seems, to lie in the holistic character of these rules. The Magician
himself or herself is involved in the process he or
she starts, and the totality of the by-effects including the
ultimate, metaphysical level seems to be quite
unpredictable. Laws of the conservation of ethical consequences of
one’s magical actions seem to have forced someone to
attempt “paying in advance” (sacrifice). Ritual purification
seems to be in the same class of strategies. A widely
believed “mechanical” nature of the Rules has stimulated
some people to try ingenious tricks to circumvent the
unwanted consequences of magic acts. Maybe one is forced
to come to the conclusion (sooner or later) that these
tricks do not work in the the long run. The famous Inner
Castle is turning into a labyrinth in which we feel
more and more hopelessly caught--if not by attempts of some
major Magick, then at least by everyday Magic every
one of us practices. (I hope to be able to speak about this in
more detail in a different place.) In a way, many of
us feel cornered (Soidla, 1995b) and in need of some
superholistic (a word I specially coined for this
case along the lines of my hypotheses) help. One seems to be
forced to come to the conclusion that only real
Spirituality (would you like to say Religion?) can cut through the
labyrinth in which we are imprisoned--and in some
level of Reality even to restore the original purity, the Original
Luminous Inner Castle of ours.
Now I return once more to some reminiscences. I had a
sleepless night once trying to articulate a possibly meaningless
proposition about a way to eternal life for
macromolecules. I was telling myself more or less the same thing
all the night: one has just to give up false
pretensions for eternity via interactions with other macromolecules. If
this is a meaningful message (to Macromolecules? and
from the Great Mind??) I can probably never learn, at least
in the “baseline reality” of ours. As a metaphor for
myself...well, I am also not too sure. Of course, there remains a
romantic possibility that something, possibly
dangerous, but real TRUTH is to reach my fellow citizens (my fellow
macromolecules) one day through
these notes of a man (now I try to be more serious), who is not very sure,
but
once again and again makes attempts to spell out
something, that--in turn--seemingly uses my strange combination
of experiences (and my commitment to a kind of
pseudoscience) to surface. Anyway, I feel that this story is one
more, but certainly not a most serious, justification
for me to fool around with the idea of macromolecules mediating
spiritual values. And now, after all the stories of
everyday life as a teacher, a more personal story of “speaking”
with plants follows. This is a very simple story that
I remember as one of most beautiful experiences of my life.
Once near Dushanbe (in Tadjikistan), a friend of mine
(maybe with some of my assistance?--I don’t remember)
took a lot of blooming Almond boughs to his car. What
followed on our way back was a most intense communication
between me and some Presence that I identified as
something related to the boughs. It was a “communication”
that was incredibly rich and unearthly “sweet”
emotionally; on our way back all the “realistic” details were
merged in a grey mist. What is most surprising is
that, indeed, nothing of the real world, of real time seemed to
enter the communication. It was a kind of pure
intensity of some emotion... and yet more than emotion, dynamic,
but objectless, and at the same time in a sense very
individual. It ended when we arrived. During the following
years I did not search for a way back to any
experience like this. Possibly, it felt like something that one needs not
more often than once in a lifetime. And maybe the
story has more to do with some ancient Fairyland than with any
real plants of our consensus reality. Anyway, the
story tells me how rich and noble my experience on this planet
can be. Are these contacts, fleeting by their very
nature, something that is not to last long with human beings?
Some strange intuition tells me “yes.” Another Room in
the House of our Father, possibly. If not just some
overimagination of mine. And here is
one more a problem. Chakras are traditionally considered as connected with
the metaphysical “levels” of experience. I accepted
the model (“SLM”) in a previous paper of mine (Soidla,
1995a). But when one tries to remember more stories it
is increasingly difficult to classify all of them. I had the
“high level” stories of healing my very being by an
icon, after “ego fainting,” stories of overcoming ego resistances
that seem to belong to the same level. At the same
time, the story about being saved after a summer solstice
nightmare feels also “high level” and yet at the same
time quite different. And “where” did I have my most memorable
“high” talk with flowers? I cannot think of these
experiences as marking three major metaphysical levels
beginning with the causal (too high, certainly too
high), so maybe each “level” consists of many smaller “bands”
that are not related hierarchically? Certainly my
quite limited experience doesn’t allow any fine mapping . . .
(Quite possibly I take the SLM and the chakra system
metaphor a bit too literally here.)
And now once more--back to the Chakras. Formulating in
biochemical terms my new hypothesis for memory, I
was rather hesitant about any mechanisms of retrieval
(Soidla, 1992, 1993b, see also Appendix). Here I would like
to make a risky parallel that helps me to visualize
one possible mechanism. As even the starting point is most
controversial, the terms introduced are most likely
mainly of mnemonic significance and the conclusions reached
(even in the best case)--just some raw material for
future better models. What I really need is to draw your
attention
to the importance of symmetry in the hypothetical
complexes involved--whatever the real molecular mechanism,
these considerations seem to hold--within the limits
of my main hypothesis, of course. Let’s suppose that in
various parts of the Brain the reading of the
hypothetical associative memory RNAs including the “mystical” nearoligomer
RNAs is conducted by RNA-chaperone molecules able to
pass RNA filaments at great speed through a
central channel (let’s use this word, bearing in
mind that the word chaperone does not imply any connection with
the real properties of protein chaperone molecules
and, of course, does not make the structures less hypothetical).
Several RNA-chaperone molecules serving different
parts of RNA can unite with extra RNA looping out. Also the
number of (major) associative memory RNAs to be used
in reading/editing processes in different parts of the brain
can be different. The information read is possibly
even to be summed up according to some parameters. Do You
remember--in Part 1 of my presentation--the Occultist
remarked about an Icon: “Quite Holy, indeed” (Soidla,
1995a)? Maybe some summation of the message of
DIFFERENT RNA molecules is also performed? Anyway it is
quite natural to visualize the editing-reading complex
(“RNA-chaperone”) molecules as symmetrical structures
with a different number of RNA-reading “petals” in
different parts of the brain. For me this is a most attractive
model of chakras. Being a part of retrieval mechanism
for the small homopolymer RNAs, chakras are part and
parcel of the mechanism revealing and expressing one’s
spiritual growth, linking one’s progress along these lines
to various “styles” of coincidences flow. The link can
even be supposed to be via “antennae”-properties of the
small repetitive RNAs (Soidla, 1992, Soidla, 1993a,
1993b, 1993c), interacting via a space [and time?] independent
Morphic resonance-like link (Sheldrake, 1987). This is
certainly a most controversial idea, to say the least, or
rather an attempt to show a possible connection
between two controversial ideas. In a way, the two other, more
basic things this speculation aims to bring together
is, first, the “traditional” idea of Chakras as symmetrical
structures mediating reality levels and, second, the
idea of integrating different sets of high level repetitive associative
memory engrams in different parts of the [central]
nervous system. N.B. I suppose ancient traditions to be
right not in every detail, but certainly ancient Yogis
were well-trained observers for (and certainly not motivated/
biased against) noticing constant patterns connected
with non-consensus realities.
The traditional chakra images are also connected with
specific syllables and colors. I do not discuss any mechanisms
here--they would be highly speculative. (Also about
this point we seem to note more controversy between
different sources.) Anyway, my own experience has
taught me that manipulations with the sound-syllables traditionally
connected with different chakras can make drastic
changes in the, say, “style” of coincidences flow in
one’s life. It can feel as living a new life, more and
more demanding, too intensive in testing one’s Ego, something
to be dis-continued before too late. My experience has
told me this about the syllables, and I suppose the colors
traditionally connected with chakras are likely to
have the same effect, (in the hands of a “wild” experimenter, at
least). I attempted Chakra meditation together with
a Christian Our Lord prayer. As a result my life seemingly
exploded with very negative experience. Maybe, to
explain my possible mistake, one can visualize two parties
determined to reach a summit, one by helicopter, and
the other one by climbing the mountain [as Alpinists]. The
learned adaptive reactions of both parties are useless
in the wrong context: helicopter piloting and rock climbing
are two very different skills. Hanging by one hand
over the precipice, one must not be so crazy as to try forcing the
engine of a some imaginary helicopter [both the
helicopter and its engine “do not belong to Alpinist’s reality,” and
his hand in the hypothetical situation can take hold
of, say, a tree branch, but he certainly must not mistake it for
the controls in a hallucinated helicopter cabin]. So
one must possibly not mix core techniques of different traditions,
especially in the realm where a thought is already an
act? Or was my inability to meet the demands created
by the practice just a part of my total Failure and in
a way almost inevitable? Maybe. Or was as it even a kind of
gift of energies (materialized as a corresponding
coincidences flow) that I could not match and blocked that gave
me the overwhelming negative feeling of this period
(the coincidences themselves were . . . a bit too demanding, to
say the least). Possibly I was just about to
drastically better my RNA level but was too scared to persist . . . . But I
certainly must also report some positive changes
[after-aftereffects?] that became obvious afterwards: a feeling of
quicker “karmic” feedback of my own actions, as in the
story with the “Shambhala dog” related here. It certainly
felt like a stream of continuous teaching that I
greatly appreciated. Maybe I got exactly the lesson I needed? Better
not to try too hard in guessing . . . !
You cannot interfere with some Global (Cosmic) level
of truth (“I AM THE TRUTH”, so it was told). “You cannot
cheat [fool, mock] the GOD... in the long run,” would
be a more fundamentalist expression of the same sentiment
(but one must still remember that God is not only NOT
MOCKED, but also NOT UNDERSTOOD as Huxley
[1970] noticed). I tried the
combination of words “Schroedinger’s Cat” and “Pandora’s Box” to approach the
mechanism of the “God’s feedback” (Soidla, 1992).
Alas, I had only some feeling, not any clear idea how it can
work on physical level. I hope to be able to return to
the important topics touched upon here one day [but see also
Soidla 1995c]. Anyway, I
would prefer never to see the new brave attempts of molecular manipulating
mystical
matters--this time on the memory engram level. Alas,
too many people are “Materialists.” Their life (they suppose)
is not an encounter with a personal Thou, but only
with some substance that being a Mother-principle indeed
exhibits qualities of a Good European Mother of a Bad
Boy (someone clearly inferior to them, and at the same
time basically good-wishing, good-tempered, and, of
course infinitely exploitable). AS A RESULT THE VERY
IDEA OF FEARING THE NUMINOUS (AND HENCE
RESPONSIBILITY) SEEMS TO BE MOST RIDICULOUS
FOR OUR GENERATION. WE ARE IN A WAY THE MOST
IRRESPONSIBLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE EVER
LIVED ON THE PLANET EARTH. My concepts of feedback, of
safeguards and regulations operating on the
Consciousness level in this world we live in are
colored by “old-fashioned” Christian religious vocabulary, but
this means that I prefer to speak in terms of not only
the Mother, but also the Father principle (archetype). I must
confess to feeling most uneasy to write it this way.
(Am I also one of the Bad Boys who prefer not to hear, much less
to write about some remote Father?) If we
follow these ideas to the level of “spiritual macromolecules” I discuss
in my papers and try to manipulate them I am sure the
results would be catastrophic, releasing one day the powerful
unerasable Father, fierce [local] gods, Dharma
guards archetype(s) of Memory/ Mind (that creates the world
we live in). I would say, even the phrase “Babel
feedback” would be a very weak expression. One can still retain
some hope to erase these archetypes this way or
another, say, at the molecular level, supposing any idea of objective
[“world-like” or even “meta-world-like”] reality of
these figures just to be a superstition (or a superego created
fantasy figure, if you wish to put it this way). What
I say now can sound hopelessly fundamentalist and against the
very spirit of Western science. But maybe, indeed,
“the one who created the World knows better . . . .” (Does this
make any sense for you?) Anyway, enough
of it here!
Together with the Failure, I acquired some health
problems that seem to resist any treatment. In the place of the
roaring flow of coincidences, they teach me now,
slowly, yes!, but it seems to be an adequate pace for my age and
abilities. Is this an illusion to see my chronic
ailments in some better context? Maybe, anyway I am almost sure I
have been taught to be more humble. And this is lesson
worth many not too pleasant lessons of any origin. I suppose
. . . that to have a total failure presents one more
result. Study of mutations (molecular mistakes) created
molecular genetics. My mistakes (maybe also a kind of
“mutations of memory RNAs,” but this is not important)
have taught me something of the workings of the
“occult” levels of psychology, maybe even revealed the very
possibility of “occult” molecular biology.
Psychosomatic phenomena and “materializations.” Some
contacts with a developing “poltergeist”: instant stilling
of a vortex of Mind (sometimes one is in position to
succeed). Guards, real life dangers and the Help. When
pushed to its limits, the metaphor of Greidanus helps
us to see the obvious step from psychosomatic phenomena
we are all more or less used to (N.B.! our experience
is most often negative)--to “materializations.” A simple
visualization, only, that certainly leads us from the
realm of Science to some kind of Science-fiction, if not of
Philosophy-fiction. But we are speaking of concepts
that can serve as practical guidelines in our everyday world
when science only too often fails; of concepts, that
would help us to organize our personal (and trans-personal)
field of experience (Krippner, 1972). Science and the
officially acceptable part of religion are still of not great help
here for many of us, with too many intuitively
important details just left out. Certainly transpersonal scholars have
a rather high level of self-censure. What one needs is
possibly a protective label to allow for a global re-invention
of pseudo and unscientific concepts and to create a
useful discipline to work with some more materials from our
spiritual vacuum-cleaner. Of course, most contemporary
concepts seem to be on a low level by some [rather
vague] intuitive criteria. Possibly it would be of
value one day... if we dare openly to stimulate (or just protect) an
effort to develop an honest not dogmatic, open, and
developing Pseudoscience and even Un-science, say, under a
label of something like Alternative Sciences?
Once more a very short story follows. I developed a
real poltergeist that troubled me when I was reading the daily
Bible many years ago. The reading soon turned to
questioning of a nasty Oracle/”Priest.” Coming through passages
that could be interpreted as very negative about me, I
was accompanied by sounds in my room, the reactions of the
“entity” to my reading grew more and more violent, and
once with an especially nasty passage, an electrical bulb
exploded over my head. This was the end of the story.
I don’t know why and how, but I felt a really overwhelming
surge of compassion towards the rather youngster-like
“entity” and realized the humorous side of the situation. I
broke into friendly laughter. This was the end of the
story. The “poltergeist” troubled me no more.
One almost certainly has had some contacts with a
quite different kind of influences--the “Guards.” They can save
Your life, as they saved mine. (You already know
the beginning of the story, that took place near the old mill at
Vuoksa river in Karelia during a near Summer Solstice
midnight. The Jesus prayer slowly took me out of staring
at the nauseating “Hellish” seemingly two-dimensional
World encircled by a legion of champions of something
like a rural life attached lower astral world [see
Soidla, 1995a].) And then it needed a real wonder to save my life
this very night, after a half an hour or so. Repeating
and repeating the Jesus prayer I very slowly returned to what
seemed to be my usual self. Some parts of my Mind
seemed to be emptied and then filled by some pure and very
soft energy. It took some hours. I was part of a small
group and other people seemed not to be aware of anything
unusual with me. (We were much younger and benignly
tolerant to rather high levels of somewhat eccentric behavior.
Really I was just rather silent and walked at my own
pace, nothing too exotic). Then we went to find a ladder
to penetrate the second floor of a locked house we
were living in. We carried a ladder and then suddenly I was
hanging over a large deep cavity full of rocks. The
ladder somehow created a seemingly almost impossible oblique
bridge carrying me. In a way I felt quite sure that a
painful (if not lethal) fall to this cavity would have also been a
metaphysical fall to an abyss for me. But now I was
saved, both on the physical and metaphysical level. Many
people know the most fundamental fact about the
Guards: most important [in the long run] is just the very feeling
of being in touch.
The Game and its Rules. Fabrication of Forms and its
Feedback. “One is needed”--towards Great Dissolution.
Guessing about the Two-dimensional Time. Most--if not
all--people speaking about the rules of the Game seem
just to be fooling themselves. Fabrication of forms
before your mind’s eye (prakriti dancing) is feverish when you
try to concentrate for Meditation or Prayer. You are
to dissolve them lovingly and knowing their emptiness. But is
it all the Game? There remains the material stuff.
In a “Strange life of Ivan Osokin,” Ouspensky proposes
a most attractive model of two-dimensional time. Our life
is repeated once more . . . and once more . . . and
once more . . . an ordinary man only supposes that he is free, in
reality he is doomed to repeat and repeat the same
dull chains of events. He repeats mechanically all his “decisions.”
But one can grow to very important moments of real
freedom--when one is able to change the next repetition.
I think most people have some feeling of this real
freedom (Christian narrow path) and also the intuition that
Eternity stands next to every second of their life. Here
I must certainly add another story. When I was ten years old
or so, I had a powerful experience on my way home. I
really hated my school, all the cold and hostile world outside
my room. Only my home was a real refuge for me. But
even this comfort was in a way uprooted when once, at
ten minutes walking distance from my door, I suddenly
realized that my coming home after some minutes will make
no difference, that this small tearful schoolboy on
the snowy deserted street will stay in the hostile “now and here”
(in a way) forever and that the happy little boy who
will enter my home’s door after some minutes will be a quite
different person (a different “me”). This feeling [of
having contacted an abysmal “other dimension of time”
expanding some “special” seconds to almost an entire
lifetime...or even more] is still with me after so many years.
What Ouspensky has done is just providing a good
teaching story, an impressive metaphor, and maybe even a
vestige of a formal model of these traditional
intuitions. (Maybe in the form they are written down in some parts of
the “Hellish Bible” W. Blake did not cite in his
“Marriage of Heaven and Hell.”) Here I would like to note some
quite obvious (and certainly most controversial)
Apocalyptic implications. Our moments of de-automatization [of
“Real free Choice” not conditioned by our Ego] in a
way open us to Eternity and give us a possibility to start a
most painful process of making free every other moment
of our life story. (Do you know the feeling of drawing dry
surgical gauze from the half-healed wound . . . Maybe
Western contemporary medicine has robbed You of this
possibility of instant understanding of the Metaphor
involved.) And when you are free with every second of your
life--only then can you leave the world that is to be
consumed by the Fire of Final Dissolution. In a way this
possibility depends of how much spiritual materialism
one has in store . . . in his or her RNA molecules.
This paper turned out to be mostly about my
speculations. The main hypothesis involved possibly is that living
through quite trivial everyday life experiences we
literally write down not only some more pages of our personal
story, but also add some shorthand notes to various
summaries of different aspects of our spiritual attainment (that
are written down as special associative memory
clusters). Both these high abstraction level “spiritual” texts and
various inherited mythological texts are involved in
editing (rewriting) of an abstract human life story (that is
“given to us”) to an individual memory text. The texts
working as editors can be modified themselves during
writing down some relevant material. When writing down
the text that is possibly to modify some levels of the
editing/ memory reading complex (and hence to modify
the very world we live in) we experience this as flow of
energy (of different levels according to what levels
of our “editorial” texts are being modified.) I am not proposing
here any really new ideas about the more fundamental
psycho-physical level. For me it seems to be as if we have
the reproducible, scientific, normal “baseline” world--for
most of the time; but possibly, for rather short periods,
quite uninvited, quite unexpected, an irreproducib le,
singular, unscientific world sucks us in, to release after some
time often a quite new personality (with different
MEANING), at least with memories one can no more forget,
pondering on them again and again, or with important
insights to change the course of one’s life. As entering the
world(s) of singularity (seemingly by chance, or along
the lines of some spiritual traditions) involves “changing
one’s mind”--all the process is usually considered
just in psychological terms. The intuition that the process involved
is really psycho-physical seems to most of us quite
unacceptable at least on practical grounds. There certainly
are no obvious ways towards a new psycho-physical
paradigm, the pressure to get involved with something
like this is mostly only connected with a very
personal sacred world of experience one prefers not to discuss--at
least in hard science terms--with other people. Does
one really need to gain fame as a scientific Don Quixote (if
not madman)? No . . . no! The tasks facing the hopeful
madman would be immense. The world with Fate, with
Flow of energies, with Father archetype, calls for new
scientific experimental methodology, new baseline hypotheses,
new axioms for deductions . . . to name just few
points. So this paper is not even an attempt at any comprehensive
and consistent set of suggestions for creating a new
Science of Singularity, not even a discussion of possible
key points. Here it is only a Dream of the new science
of the world when the Great Man awakens, but certainly,
for me this is a significant dream (as some dreams
are)--and sometimes I even suppose that the new future
science will bear some resemblance to some fragments
of this dream of mine, but certainly in quite different combinations
. . . and possibly only in the clear light of seeing
at last face to face the Great Thou (our real self?). You
know what I mean . . . . Let’s return to
the more personal “level.” About the “high energies,” they seemed to be
present during most of the period covered by the
autobiographical material of this presentation and to determine
the overall half-crazy air of most of my stories. During
writing this paper the altered states of consciousness [of
past years?] kept returning to me. Maybe you can even
feel this, when reading certain passages of the text (that are
not touched by later [ordinary state] revisions),
mostly as a “blinking” of definite [feeling]tones...or as a kind of
“background music,” but sometimes even as a demanding
“melody” leading the very narrative. But really the
subject still needs a special treatise (as well as the
line of Failure). I am looking forward to be able to write down
such material one day. But what about the Hope? I
certainly felt it when I started writing this paper. But then the
sense of Hope began to flutter, together with a
realization that I was telling some things that make this text suitable
to no one in the scientific community (including
transpersonalists), even as a kind of belief exercise, or as a game
of new Geometries of Meaning. I
do not think that I am being overcritical, telling it this way, and finishing
this one
more attempt of mine, I feel a bit tired and sad. And
still the Hope, not supported by any real chance to communicate
my intuitions to my fellow scientists (who would be
shocked, or, even in the best case, certainly demand much
stronger arguments to change their mind) still
persists. Maybe I am not right in supposing that any success of my
undertaking would be a matter of real importance . . .
even for me? Nevertheless, I feel that I need to persist, to work
more. Maybe I must learn of Hope with No Object (besides
Being in Touch). One day I’ll understand, maybe . . . .
Illusions, “real” coincidences, possible
mind-over-matter effects have merged into a flow of teaching that I sometimes
seem to enter or leave as if of some passive will of mine.
(The Numinous is always with me, it is I who cannot
be with the Numinous.) Does science turn into Wisdom
or Folly (or both) when the succession of life events turns
into Flow of Teaching? I still don’t know . . . .
APPENDIX
THE BASIC HYPOTHESIS: AN EDITING MODEL OF MEMORY
(Soidla, 1993a, 1994b, 1994c)
MEMORY RECORDING IS BASED ON EDITING OF AN INHERITED
HUMAN LIFE STORY TEXT. Firing/rest
patterns of neurons are registered at CONSTANT SPEED
(pulse rate <50 Hz, most likely around 40 Hz). The
Plenum of no less than 104 memory recording cells is
needed for full memory reconstruction. The daily memory
information is transferred to a different cellular
compartment (or a different cell contacting the primary memory
recording neuron) for permanent storage in the form of
a stable master memory engram--as a rule, during sleep
time. This information transfer is connected with
multistage EDITING of an pre-existing (INHERITED) Universal
Human Life story engram (or maybe an individualized and
neural pathway [or neuron map] specific version of it
created by combination of hypervariable blocks) using
as molecular tools the Universal Myth/ Archetype engrams
(that are also INHERITED). The editing process results
in creating a new enlarged edition of the master memory
engram. The master memory engram is most likely a
giant macromolecule that uses 2 different building blocks
(monomers) to register the firing/rest pattern of a
given neuron [neural map], some (most likely 2) other chemically
different monomers are used to “comment” upon the
major message and are added during the editing process.
This engram includes a constant part containing a set
of basic service signals and at least two variable parts:
(1) a full almost life-long linear record of firing-rest
patterns of a given neuron; (2) some more general additional
information (“comments on living”). Variable
(“IN-TIME”) part 1 is punctuated by clock signals (providing guide
marks for synchronization of the time-dependent memory
retrieval mechanism). Variable (“TIMELESS,”
“MYTHOLOGICAL”) part 2 is most likely situated within
a special class of larger synchronization (“clock”)
signals (“filled commas”) and contains guide marks for
an associative memory based retrieval mechanism and
other variable service signals. The memory reading
device of unspecified nature is placed in the membrane between
memory recording and memory storage compartments
(cells) and can partially overlap with the editing
complex and possibly also with a focus of
Consciousness on the molecular level. At least the permanent storage
memory engrams are likely to be RNA molecules in sum
total reaching Lilium genome size (that also roughly
equals the summary stable RNA length in a typical
eukaryotic cell). Another product of the editing reaction is a
growing set of separate associative memory engrams
(containing excerpts of a master memory engram and/or
recognition sequences of an associative memory
cascade). A special class of associative memory engrams (they
are likely to be among the more slowly growing ones)
interacts with the Universal Myth engrams [that are inherited,
but grow & develop with accumulating experience
and personal growth] to make the active editing complex--
a dynamic structure capable for considerable
development during human lifetime. Both the Associative Memory
and the Mythological Heritage are INSTRUMENTAL in the
very process of the master Memory record creating.
This means, that in the process of Memory recording,
TEXTS ARE EDITING TEXTS. Both sets of associative
memory and Universal Myth Engrams are organized
hierarchically according to: (1) successive editing steps; and
(2) growing abstraction levels of associative memory
engrams. The HIGHEST ABSTRACTION LEVEL associative
memory engrams (whose very slowly growing variable
parts consist of a simple repetitive structure) register
qualities like unconditional love or moments of real
free will [overcoming ego resistance] and are likely to provide
unique opportunities for ultimate steps of personal
growth and self-actualization and can be even supposed to be
involved in non-local interactions of a novel kind.
Some ultimate metaphysical questions are likely to be related to
properties of the most simple biological “texts” of
these small engrams of repetitive structure. One can even
suppose that every Memory recording cell contains two
editors, the first one, that is related to individual consciousness,
being concerned with editing the IN-TIME parts of
Memory engram, the other one, related to
supraindividual Consciousness editing TIMELESS parts
of Memory engram. A hypothetical highest aim of human
development can then be related to uniting these
editing complexes [as a result of fulfillment of a human need to
write down a “right” set of associative memory texts].
This operating union of individual experience and timeless
[“mythological”] wisdom possibly opens new
perspectives and possibilities not limited to our [usual] human
condition, that certainly lie beyond the scope of this
hypothesis.
REFERENCES
Arguelles, J., & Arguelles, M. (1972). Mandala.
London: Shambhala.
Frankl, V. E. (1969). Man’s search for meaning. New
York: Washington Square Press.
Green, E. E., & Green, A. M. (1971). On the
meaning of transpersonal: Some metaphysical perspectives. Journal
of Transpersonal Psychology, 3, 27-46.
Greidanus, J. H. (1961). Fundamental physical theory
and the concept of consciousness. London: Pergamon Press.
Greidanus, J. H. (1972). The psycho-physical nature of
reality. Transactions of the Netherlands Royal Academy of
Sciences. 1st Series, 26 (4), 5-55.
Greidanus, J. H. (1975). Psycho-physical theory
(improved). Proceedings of the Netherlands Royal Academy of
Sciences, Series B, 78, 1-37.
Hameroff, S. R. (1987). Ultimate computing:
Biomolecular consciousness and nanotechnology. Amsterdam: North
Holland. Heywood, R. (1966). The infinite hive.
London: Pan Books.
Huxley, A. (1970). The perennial philosophy. New York:
Harper.
Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (1987). Margins of
reality. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Krippner, S. (Ed.). (1972). The plateau experience: A.
H. Maslow and others. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology,
4, 107-120.
Leadbeater, C. W. (1971). The chakras. London: Theosophical
Publishing House.
Lilly, J. C. (1973). The center of the cyclone. New
York: Bantam.
Rudhyar D. (1983). Rhythm of wholeness. Wheaton, IL:
Theosophical Publishing House.
Sheldrake, R. (1987). A new science of life: The
hypothesis of formative causation (2nd ed.). London: Collins.
Soidla, T. R. (1992). Schroedinger’s cat in Pandora’s
box. 12th International Transpersonal Conference (Prague)
Abstracts, p.10.
Soidla, T. R. (1993a). Morphic resonance, molecular
structure, and man: Some metaphysics. International Journal
of Transpersonal Studies, 12 (2), 51-55.
Soidla, T. R. (1993b). A RNA-editing based model of
memory. Folia Baeriana, 6, 261-268.
Soidla, T. R. (1993c). Biological texts and spiritual
values. Revival of Russian Religious Philosophical Thought
(Proceedings of the International Conference, March
22-24, 1993). St. Petersburg: Glagol, pp.25-29.
Soidla, T. R. (1995a). Open mouth, open mind: An
impressionistic attempt of a transpersonal autobiography. Part
1. “Energies” and states of consciousness. International
Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 14, Supplement.
Soidla, T. R. (1995b). Open mouth, open mind: An
impressionistic attempt of a transpersonal autobiography. Part
3. Transpersonal fox speaking in a trap or how I was
cornered, but managed not to make the necessary
conclusions. Manuscript in preparation.
Soidla, T. R. (1995c). Practical molecular
book-keeping. Manuscript in preparation.
Soidla, T. R. (1995d). 66 illegitimate questions on
memory and consciousness. Manuscript in preparation.
Tart, C. T. (1975). States of Consciousness. New York:
Dutton.
OPEN MOUTH, OPEN MIND: AN IMPRESSIONISTIC ATTEMPT AT A TRANSPERSONAL
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
PART 3. TRANSPERSONAL FOX SPEAKING IN A TRAP OR HOW I WAS CORNERED BUT
MANAGED NOT TO MAKE THE PROPER CONCLUSIONS
T. R. SOIDLA
INSTITUTE OF
CYTOLOGY ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA
Introduction. Having passed 56
years on a path toward a personal Omega hour [a perfectly natural but
personally so significant an event] one is inclined to re-vision and revise the
Mystery of one's life, to look once more through the list of questions that
seems to be growing and growing (at least it is there in spite of all the
lifelong science and philosophy-backed attempts of authoritative answers). As
the final Step seems to grow more and more real, one feels more and more free
of the taboos of Western thinking. The taboos are reasonable, certainly, but
there are also reasons not to keep being only reliable and reasonable. At the
same time, reasons to ask some forbidden questions remain with me, but it is
not I who is supposed to [really] answer them. [Almost all] the speculations
here count just as surrogate answers, something just "to keep the ball [of
thought] flying." There is a power in forbidden mind-games and questions.
Maybe this paper will persuade or [re]hypnotize—who cares?—some readers of this
text to search for Adamic fresh answers. So let's ponder together over these
old "illegal" questions—suggested by some stuff that is usually
ignored—hidden in the personal garbage of everyday life artifacts. Need we to
be bothered that some of them seem to be meaningless in the coordinates of
scientific thought and others seemingly well-answered a long time ago?
Possibly one can feel with one's guts (can you handle such an argument?) that
they were possibly TOO well answered? Indeed, there are things one seems to be
afraid to give a second thought to, so some remain just what they are—quite
possible—but no more than just POSSIBLE—reductionistic answers.
Need I add that there are other much better planned
and executed attempts to reconsider, to revise the "obvious"? Here I
would mention the transpersonal studies in toto--is it not so?--(Walsh,
1993; Walsh & Vaughan, 1993), the brilliant ideas of Sheldrake (1987,
1994), the breathtakingly new and powerful ways of blending Western
philosophy/science with Buddhist wisdom by Guenther (1989), or the most
impressive experimental hero's journey by Jahn and Dunne (1987). Still isolated
from the mainstream of science, some of these approaches will lead Western
science to a real breakthrough one day, I hope & await. My own papers are a
bit different. Approaching final personal questions must be of ultimate
practical value, and this is why [again and again in human history] one cannot
be limited to either contemporary science or philosophy, not even to a limited
concept of "personal" (hence my papers are submitted to a journal of
transpersonal studies). Being a scientist, I use some scientific terms—I am
used to this kind of language, but certainly in a manner that attempts to
transcend their essentially limited scientific usage. At the same time (as
science is developing towards including the whole range of human experience,
and as "there are many rooms in the home of my father". . . and
possibly also many routes towards this home), I would suppose that there will
be some place for my not scientific, but still maybe science-related attempts—possibly
adding some missing color, odor, or shade to ideas and terms to be used one day
in both a responsible and adequate manner.
Leningrad kitchens
in the '60s. A meeting I did not enjoy. A kind of post-hypnotic suggestion ...
or what? Some more words on high energies. How I was cornered. How I left the
Path Г?] Some more words
about the Failure. There is time for both high-energy and post-high-energy
worlds. "Guilt is the teacher, love is the lesson" (indeed they are).
On teaching stories and "learning stories." On speaking with EGO and
with Alter Ego [Altered States of Consciousness Egos]. On programming,
metaprogramming. and on texts—"transpersonalizators." This paper is
intended to continue, and possibly even to finish, some lines of the two previous
"autobiographical" papers of mine (Soidla, 1995a, 1995b). I'll start
with the Leningrad kitchens in the '60s. This is really not the beginning of
the story. But who knows what is the Real beginning of one's story? So why not
a kitchen? In the '60s and '70s, a great number of very interesting people in
our city worked as stokers, street-sweepers, etc. One could have a most
stimulating intellectual exchange in quite an unexpected place (and time). But
kitchens were something really special. With no telephone (the Ear of the
State) nearby, and with a cup of tea or a glass of dry wine ... or vodka in
one's hand—this seemed to be the freest place in the world (possibly it really
was!). For me it was all O.K. this way. For example ... (I wrote these words: "for
example" and understood my mistake. I had to take this story with the same
ultimate seriousness and attention as some other ones I relate here. So the
following lines are an attempt to give this story its proper due). O.K. I was
introduced to a man all in gray . . . "Yes, I am a street-sweeper,"
or something like this was his casual remark, and then he demonstrated some
apparently brilliant knowledge of several occultists of the past (my reading
about them was most superficial). Then followed something about the Sphinx . .
. that I hope to recollect one day. His words remained alive in me for many
years, though I did not pay them the full attention they probably deserved. I
was deluded by the easy-going manner of this conversation; I felt myself being
at least equal to him (why?). By now I see I have lost something most valuable.
"Sphinx" seems to have been one of the keywords of my life, but this
is mostly a kind of post factum feeling. The word is not instrumental;
it does not really help me. But it could ... I suppose. A gift half-received
and almost completely lost. No wonder that after some time I had another
meeting. The God's "megaphone" of painful experience, as discussed by
C. S. Lewis (1991), was present this time (but used in a most gentle way).
I was visiting a very humanly,
mature, nice old woman, an occultist working with handicapped children, who
certainly was undeservedly kind towards me, an arrogant and cowardly spiritual
"foreigner." She was waiting for a friend to visit her and was
talking about him in a most reverent way. I, of course, knew better, living
with an illusion that I had seen quite enough of what Leningrad (St.
Petersburg) could offer along these lines (N.B.! Kindly remember that I am not
Russian, but Estonian by origin . . . nevertheless I had lived in Leningrad for
more than 10 years at the time). He arrived and among first things asked for
some cheap red wine (I remember it this way, but maybe I am wrong). She left to
buy it in a nearby shop. I felt some revulsion towards the whole situation, but
I got involved in some social exchange. I told him about my definition of
materialists which I was rather proud about (Soidla, 1995b). He answered with
some lazy compliment to my "European" brains. I attempted adding
something about Tantra, a topic I am rather ignorant about, but certainly have
some "bright" ideas of "how it all works." In his answer he
mentioned the Kalachakra Tantra as a most popular one in our country. My inner
reaction was fantastically silly, albeit maybe typical for me. I did not know
anything about the Kalachakra, but I was European (was there some irony in his
intonation? Probably, yes. Forget it!) so any limitations of all these Russians
did not apply to me. I don't remember my answer but I suppose that all these
reactions of mine found some way, if not to the final message, then at least to
the corresponding intonation. And now it was his time to hit back (or at least
this was the way I interpreted the situation). He drank some wine, then some
more wine . . . and then it began! Can I answer, please, why Jesus, Buddha and
Mohammed did what they did? I had not the slightest idea. I did not like the
situation at all. He: "Because they were cornered. " Me (silently):
How! Why! How can this too human idea be The Answer? Aloud: " O.K.., it is
most interesting, but unfortunately it is the very time for me to leave"
(immediately!). He is looking at his wrist-watch. Can I stay 40 minutes longer?
This Is Very Important. (NO!!!) Unfortunately I could not. I left in a hurry and
took an electric train to the suburb where I lived during these years. What
followed was not surprising for me. I was ready to meet up with something like
this. At my stop I just could not leave the train car. (I was sitting in my
place and wondering why I am not leaving the train.) ... I left the train next
station and just walked back. When at last I entered the door to my flat I
looked (quite automatically) at my watch. I was exactly 40 minutes late.
"This means nothing. Maybe a kind of post-hypnotic suggestion. Even if it
was a real paranormal feat, this means nothing. I know several sons-of-bitches
with obviously real paranormal abilities." (Really!) In a kind of
aggressive but passive mode I thought: "So, what?" This last question
I can answer by now. During the past 15 or so years after this memorable
meeting, I have felt more and more cornered and this grew into a dominant
feeling in my life. There are some important details. Just a few years ago—the
corner, as if miraculously, expanded. Still, in a way the feeling of being
cornered is here, elusive and important—as some dreams seemingly not related to
anything serious in our life still feel important. And sometimes— as if
having converted the negative energy to positive (as discussed in Crampton, 1974;
Soidla, 1995 a, 1995b), or having reached a kind of comer plateau state (a not
too serious term coined after Maslow (Krippner, 1992) or maybe having
recognised & accepted my fallen state—I perceive being cornered as a
most comfortable and natural position.
Many years ago I was intoxicated about high
energies. I could just sit in half-Lotus position and a flow of energy would
pass through my body. I had a feeling that I could accomplish anything but I
wanted just to sit (so far so good) and to watch on some inner screen the heads
of my friends exploding with the energy gifts I sent in every direction. (An
illusion, of course, but I still feel that it was a most peaceful and friendly
illusion.) I had developed my "inner eye" and reached some
sensitivity to thoughts of my fellow humans. Of course, there was a lot of idle
talk and certainly I had not succeeded in any real purification of my
"everyday mind." My state at the time seemed to be a rather common
combination for a half-mature seeker. The end of this period was personally
frustrating, but theoretically, I suppose, quite revealing. In a
half-instinctive search towards some new horizons, I attempted combining my
evening prayer (I identify myself as a Christian, a bad Christian, certainly)
with some work on chakras. A quick answer I got was a seemingly global change
of coincidences pattern in my life. Possibly it was a gift of a powerful
challenge, an exercise in negative and positive energies. Being a coward (I
must admit this) I did not even attempt to meet the new demands. I discontinued
my new practice. Did I leave the Path this way? Possibly, yes. Often I have a
definite feeling that I missed a unique possibility to take the athletic
MOUNTAIN PATH that opened to me during these years. I also have an alternative
view of this lost labors story. One can reach a mountain peak as an alpinist or
as a helicopter pilot. Both ways are legitimate, but one cannot thoughtlessly
combine these two routes. An alpinist hanging over an abyss cannot help himself
or herself thinking in terms of accelerating, as I noted in an earlier part of
this paper (Soidla, 1995a). (But maybe the last metaphor underestimates the
holistic, conscious, and compassionate aspect of our world.) Anyway, I have a
definite feeling that I did not return to my starting point. In a way, the
Story still continues (or do I have a bit different eyes now?) and a Failure
was an integral part of my story, an alternative, or possibly the main Gift.
With me the post-high energy world seems to be a world of purification. Maybe
the above said is once more a kind of illusion and maybe I am on a sure way to
see in my after-death dreams that I have "died as a dog." Who knows?
The feeling of his Master's hand keeps a dog sure that everything is O.K.
Many people seem to have
realized that texts which are created in an altered state of consciousness seem
to help one to return to the ASC when reading them. What is possibly even more
interesting is that these texts seem to bring other people to an ASC of the
same or of a different kind [something to be studied one day?]. Questions
addressed to the reader, key words and hidden mantras, rhythms, sound patterns,
the logic & grammar of the text, to sum up: all these items related to the
very essence of LITERATURE can be [and are] suspected of being involved. Is
this really a kind of transpersonal brainwashing, programming and
meta-programming of one's "biocomputer"? A really transpersonal stand
must be open and unmanipulative—just to be called transpersonal. And still
there is no real border between true texts-transpersonalizators, skillful means
of subtle manipulation to help us, friendly brainwashing, planting positive
attitude . . . one can continue towards an authoritative heavily
manipulation-based end of this continuum.
Is it possible to speak about
"transpersonalizators" and not to mention W. Blake once more and once
more? His "The angel rolling the stone away from the Sepulchre"
creates such a profound feeling of inner silence—possibly to repeat the silence
and concentration of the author himself when he finished the water color. There
seems to be something special with Silence. Why are simple psychosynthesis
exercises (Williams, 1980) aimed to create inner silence so powerful? We must
have an immense innate ability to create the inner silence states. Whatever the
relationship of this "silencability" to hypnotizability, it seems to
be almost not used by our Western civilization—but here it is, "behind the
filmiest of screens." And still, this is only one entrance to a most
complex "inner building." Subtle and manifold are the means of a true
transpersonalizator. One has just to ponder on the works by Blake:
"Jerusalem" (plate 76), "Jacob's dream," and many others.
But do I have a
pleasant illusion of my texts being in a way "transpersonalizators"?
In a way, possibly, yes—but of course not real transpersonalizators, rather
some altered states of consciousness [ASC] facilitators—certainly it is for You
to recall & decide after reading the first two parts of my texts. Anyway, I
have not used any cunning devices, simply texts written in ASC seem to help one
to reach [some?/the same?] ASC—possibly because it would be painful to follow
state-specific logic and metalogic in a too different state of consciousness,
so one is left with a dilemma: (1) to deny the text; or (2) in the case of
certain fluency of inter-states of consciousness "travel"--just to
shift her/his state. I have tried to leave parts of texts written in alleged
ASCs in their original form and use them as building blocks of my compositions,
but it is difficult to leave them so in all the chefs-d'oeuvre of
state-specific thinking. One either has to disclose [and more or less spoil]
his trick or sacrifice some sentences to allow the text to survive—to pass
[self] censure by ordinary [baseline] consciousness and subsequent even most
friendly editing. My friend and "second editor" S.S. has been
ruthless about grammar, but most sensitive towards individual style and
tolerant towards ASC logic, so I had to execute my own self-censoring faculties
at different stages of the editing process (it is not an easy thing to
de-hypnotize oneself in a situation like this). The result is a certain
compromise, still too crazy for many readers, but certainly not too radical for
other ones, and certainly falling short of reaching a demonstration of any
approximation of the full power of a possible "glass bead game"
[Hesse, 1969] with ASC materials that I intuitively seem to perceive. A task
for other, future authors [of this "hypertext"—who are in a way more
"real" than me], possibly.
My second Apology
about Pseudoscience. From Apology to Apotheosis[?] Allosophia and
Al-pan-sophia. Can one be productive and honest being pseudoscientific?
"Maybe we lack the very culture of pseudo-science." On
"romantic" science. "Wrong is beautiful." On the romantic
and other traps on the "wrong way." "Reasonably"
overstrained scientific statements versus "romantic" statements. A
bush and a butterfly. On the first, second and third attempt(s) [that are
supposed (1) to reveal. (2) to confuse, and (3) to tell a lie] according to the
"I Ching." On the logic of spiritual realms of Mind. Sclerotic
delights, "many world interpretations, "resurrection by memory repair,
or what? On an alternative, not "romantic" but "ascetic"
["sentimental," "melancholic"] science [science-like
activity] of humility and hope. [sometimes of shameless humility, maybe . . . ]. I cannot
have a clear vision of my position without attempting to ponder over the term
"pseudoscience." I have always been a bit too
"psi-positive" to be a normal scientist. What is left for me? Two
main possibilities are: to Imitate or to Understand (this is the way I see my
position). I would like to share some most doubtful information here. Any
"dialogues" with nature spirits, one's "genius," higher
consciousness, etc., are quite suspect a priori, as one has only minimal
(if any) information of one's partner in dialogue, who is in the best case
least likely to tell platitudes in the form of plain truth as we see it.
Anyway, by "creative" use of one particular Japanese-English
dictionary, I was always able to come to some cynical but generally quite
trustworthy expressions concerning my friends (Soidla, 1995a). Of course, this
is just something for one who likes these kinds of things. What seems to be
most important now is the feeling that the very procedure both gives . . . and
takes something. I have not played this game for many years. What is important
to be mentioned in this part of my paper is that my own name elicited an answer
"pseudo-scientist"--something I have been sure about for a long time.
But what does it mean? Due to the most important principle of "Ockham's
razor" one can develop scientific concepts by small steps only. Even the
greatest breakthroughs still remain connected with the main body of facts and
concepts, and even in the most remarkable cases when they open an entirely new
field of inquiry, these new domains are still to be exploited in the same most
conservative manner. Science can be compared with a growing bush in the sense
that new additions must be connected with the main body. According to this
metaphor, science is a small bush in a corner of multidimensional space of
possibilities that attempts to organize this huge space. [It must still grow
perhaps millennia to turn into a real Tree of World filling the space.] As
human beings we find it difficult to limit ourselves to this very complex but
in a way still tiny compartment of the space. We can reach the vast realms of
it directly using contemplation, intuition, most likely one needs better to
fill in here some unnamed human faculties. These flights above the bush of
science remind me of merry butterflies. Isn't it so that supposing them to be
tired of space the butterflies periodically want to return to safe branches of
the bush of science? Must one feel anxious about the very possibility of
flights above the bush, or of the feeling that suggests returning to the safe
branches? Anyway, it seems that one must be able to tell the bush from
butterflies! Maybe one would prefer a different picture--of slime molds—that in
amoebic forms are individually exploring the space but are also able to gather
to make a mock multicellular organism, even a fruit body. Anyway, the last one
seems not to be a picture of contemporary science, maybe an alternative
possibility to be realized one day. I have a feeling that contemporary
scientific method itself is something to be overcome one day (Soidla, 1993a).
Many people have possibly
confronted something like a "beginner's luck." There are also the
well-known "decline effects" in parapsychology. Some people (and I
among them) can even feel the "decline effects" being a kind of
"signature" of their predominant life situations pattern. If the
reality of all these effects, like the one of parapsychological phenomena in
general, is an open question, there are even more specific suggestions in
age-old texts like the "I Ching": "First time I'll reveal,
second time I'll confuse, third time I'll tell You a lie." (Is the
expression really there? This is a formulation given by a most creative friend
of mine [F.R.]. But my one attempt to locate this expression in the "I
Ching" led to the discovery of shorter related formulas, not the above
one. But this way or another, the formula seems to exist in some of the I Ching
spaces, in some branches of the I Ching hypertext," in our I Ching
consciousness. I just cannot let go of this beautiful formulation.) In my
experience with oracles of different kinds, including the "I Ching"
and "The Golden Oracle," I have found it astonishingly true. Here it
would be difficult to suppose a chance hit followed by many misses even in real
life situations. I have consulted the sources not so often—just in several
crisis situations. And the first astonishingly penetrating answer is not to be
diluted by repeated questioning. Indeed, second time—confusion, third time, a
lie. I have made the same mistake of repeating my question several times. But
after a considerable time span everything seems to work well once more. It
seems that the test will surprisingly easily resonate the predominant pattern
of Your "life type situation"—just ask, please. We have a strangely
deep fear of being "boring" in our very essence, a "crystallized"
experience of our former contacts with the "fate forming factors," an
intuitive fear of questioning Moiras, or impossibility to reach twice some
pattern-making factors of our memory. Any repetition can interfere with the
works of timeless [repetitions-based] editing factors [?]. Maybe the problem is
even much wider. One knows, how easily an unselfish act—by a
self-congratulating pathway or some other related ways—turns into a most
egotistic activity. The trap of ego-related spirituality, of "spiritual materialism,"
is open to every one of us (Trungpa, 1987). I suppose that our high abstraction
level associative memory engrams are not fooled, and they register an unselfish
act only when a real unselfish act is performed. We are aware of a point of
consciousness that is not fooled by "spiritual" ego games of ours.
Maybe the oracle rules provide one more keyhole to see how such an inner
witness really works, to the very logic of spiritual realms of Mind.
Related to this can be another
type of story that I have experienced several times in different contexts. What
follows is a rather abstract "skeleton" of this "one cell of a
human life story": You gave something valuable away [even if it is just
some money to a beggar] and--performed surprisingly well [or had a piece of
good luck]. Second time you give some money away EXPECTING some good luck [good
performance] and the result is more or less positive once more [but you could
have noticed that this time it was in a way a bit confusing—maybe in small
details]. Third time you feel pretty sure giving out your "piece of
mammon" (as if directly paying to the fate-[per]forming-forces), and FAIL.
But this is not quite the end of the story. One quickly learns the trick of
expecting and at the same time of not expecting. (A kind of cheating Mr. God,
maybe?) But it turns out not to be quite a trick (or gets the trickster himself
in a way to be tricked?). Anyway, as a result of playing this "game of
consciousness" one grows aware of a greater picture: one cannot enjoy full
being in the world without personal involvement [or is one better to
say—without involvement of his/her very personality] in a FLOW OF LETTING GO/of
giving away—of things, possibilities, dear ones. This is a middle way, and
intertwined with it [as ida and pingala with sushumna in Kundalini yoga] are
possibly the pathways to creative failure and fossilizing success. [The very
logic of the fossilizing/"spiritual narcotic dependence generating"/"fundamentalizator"
pathway would certainly deserve some special intuitive/historical study.]
By the way, returning to
the I Ching hypertext metaphor: possibly due to some sclerotic changes in my
brain I quite often have a feeling of tunnel-walking from world to world in a
branching many-world cosmos. In the realm of peripheral mental vision, in the
Mind room where everything is a bit out of focus, concepts and even citations I
supposed to know by heart seem suddenly to change one day; what seems to be in
a way most disturbing, people who—I know—must be dead, happily pop out, healthy
and alive [by the way, isn't this a quite nice side of the story?]. Is it a
result of some repair ["undelete"] in cosmic memory and just my
noticing this is a mistake of the memory apparatus? A most crazy remark of
mine, but have You not experienced something like this yourselves, a different
variety of deja vu, maybe? Certainly, this attempt to
extract a theory out of doings or un-doings of one's sclerotic brain/mind
sounds even more unacceptable than any other extravaganzas of mine. It is as if
at a dinner table I asked my neighbor: "Why really do people wash their
faces every day, and never—their feet?" (to repeat a popular Russian
joke). But still I feel that I had to take this particular piece out of my
personal Memory garbage can and to present it to you with a friendly but
absolutely mad smile. But if you did not react to the above story
like to something alarming and "impossible," I must both congratulate
and warn you—a transpersonalizable, creative New Age personality, my sister or
brother: the barriers of Your baseline reality have grown [semi]permeable. This
is almost certainly a future next step for humanity, but often still remains a
real disaster for a concrete Western individual of the XXth century.
If "romantic"
science not only allows irresponsible remarks in metaphysical matters, but also
gets involved in some more or less loosely related experimentation, e.g.,
behaves in a most youngster-like, over-enthusiastic way—then can we also
imagine a complementary deviation, an old-man way of reacting to the possible
real existence of a mysterious part in human existence and in the world: some
humble restriction of one's ways of behavior, some ascetics of no aim, and
openness to what will come to you? Alas, I rather understand the power of
ascetic achievement, but even this paper still belongs to the realm of romantic
preparatory rite. A kind of baby-talk, a kind of preliminary exercise, just
training—controlled by the Great Mind part of us like the playful activities
of puppies. Possibly a right thing to do, but one most not feel too proud for
all this. (For this romantic science-like babbling that is to give way to
discipline, silence and possibly—achievement one day.) For an outsider, both
romantic and melancholic science would not be a science at all. When attempting
to avoid emotional labels [but still being attached to
the very game of Science] one would possibly adopt a wording like
"science-related activity." This would certainly be
a better term to describe the genre of my recent papers.
Some thoughts
behind the Pandora's box. On Eternity and on the Productions of Time (some more
of the Love Story, or maybe better, of being in Touch). On a doggy or on the
lemurs of Madagascar intoning towards a rising Sun. The very idea that there
exists a SPECIAL BLACK BOX and that the very attempt of looking into this box
brings most disastrous developments to one's life story seems most important:
kinds of perennial intuitions just awaiting their hour.
I have always been possessed
by the idea of some achievement, of some fundamental understanding. Years pass,
a former understanding has shown its backside of sheer comic illusion, and
still I have a feeling that I understand something fundamental, but of a
different kind. Of course, the passing years have taught me something of the
REAL WORLD, but the basic illusion possibly marked by the very feeling of
[intellectual, and . . .] understanding is certainly still with me. At the same
time, how expressive, powerful, often violent but multidimensional, was the
flow of teaching when I was younger. At least for me it still makes a better
story than the following milder and more subtle flow of teaching.
There are metaphors that seem
to live a life of their own, maybe being the very guests of our brains from the
Great Mind realm of collective unconscious. One of these was implied in the
words of a strange rather crazy artist. He told me how he feels that the sole
REAL music in our planet is what lemurs on Madagascar sing at dawn. And, yes,
his lemurs have in a way awakened my lemurs by now ....
A Russian madman or
the Confessions of a Baltic crackpot. CP and some more names. "My
number" 66 and the rotating pentagram. The countless often quite intricate
ways to organize one's life story. Some memorable Yoga practitioners. Bleeding
nose. pressure on head. On one's [[un]ability to draw a perfectly evil face.
Empty cup and spiritual bullshit. Gurus and followers (devotees). Doesn't the I
of I-Thou have no head? Of many shameful memories of the years that have
passed, this is most likely a most painful, a most shameful one, a horror that
grew out of seemingly nothing to make a living hell of so many years of my
life. As a result of a silly joke of mine I was called a crap-pot [or something
like this, am I to add that this is only one possible English translation of
the original Estonian pun?], a label that stuck to me for so many years making
me feel damned because of some basic sinfulness, some dark rotten stuff
permeating the very ground of my personality, some infinite wrongness growing
from a level that one is never able to change. A lot of later humiliating
stories added to this cluster. As a result, the feeling of being cornered, the
experience of being in a non-exit situation (plus the whole bundle of related
negative feelings), has been with me almost as long as I can remember. I only
managed to forget it now and then, but it kept returning as if a most potent
personal negative reward in the games that various emerging consciousness
structures played--maybe attempting to teach me, maybe wanting to gain some
ephemeral life [in me]. During my last days in the University, my former
roommate (now a VIP in one of the independent Baltic states) got drunk and
found the following words to tell me: "Really, you are a crapjack, maybe
you suppose that you are a nice guy, but for me you are just a crapjack."
(He certainly did not know about the specific Achilles' heel of mine, but
altered states of consciousness somehow allow one to read the forbidden
records. N.B.! One must remember that this is only an attempt to translate
the original Pun of Fate.) And after so many years I can only guess what my
recent [sorry] rectal troubles can mean. Is some "psychical
entity" communicating something important to me, or trying just to
manipulate me? And what is also important: is the sensitivity of these earlier
years really gone, or is it still here, "behind the filmiest of
screens"? Or was it all just a Great Gambit to prepare me for my real
Ultimate Failure, for the growing metaphysical understanding of being Really
cornered just as a result of being human? (This melody of failure is tempered
by rare mad bangs of remembering the Zen words about Buddha as a shit stick,
but well, [at least before the final enlightenment] I am certainly not to
appear in the still cryptic pure and luminous side of this timeless picture . .
. keeping being repeated again and again in different humiliation scenes in
some middle abstraction level associative memory engram.) Anyway, the very
being of a Russian madman (or Baltic crackpot if you prefer it this way) often
blocks my attempts to TEACH, to "preach" seriously anything SPIRITUAL.
"Would You like some teachings of a Crap-pot"?--"Oh, boy ... I
see! I'll think about Your kind offer . . .!" As a result, my position can
be only very weak, lacking some basic authority; it can even seem that I can
only share, maybe search for auditors and at the same time real [responsible]
authors of the ideas that have [literally] come to me, but never pretend to be
an author/source [at least of anything spiritually important] of my own. And
this is beautiful!! Thanks to the youngsters who bullied me. Due to these guys
I am more useless, due to them my boat sometimes even seems to be almost empty.
(Does it mean that I hid my talent in the ground? I don't think so [but,
well, the orchestration of the main themes of our life seems often to be so
incredibly rich].)
There is another
aspect of this story. Indeed, a large growing associative memory cluster brings
together all these episodes. Must one call this any wonder? There are aspects
with stories like this one could call self-constellating constellations of
events [coined after self-fulfilling prophecies]. And given all this is why I
feel so sure that a kind of intelligence was acting through all this half
psycho-mechanical instrumentarium that one can describe in both western or
eastern terms [like "karma" and "vasanas"]. An illusion
possibly, but maybe also an intelligence of my own soul being able to use any
crap for the multi-stage process of self-building. [But now the question
emerges that Ramana Maharshi asked: Who is the I [Self] of my I [Ego]? Where is
the source of the I-thought?] And from the other side, to see a kind of scientific
problem behind all this--certainly not a problem of XXth century science-one
needs a still not existing science of patterns of human life, a new I Ching. Or
what?
Yes, strange labels have emerged seemingly from
nowhere to organize my experience (as if some greater mind indeed was aiming to
reveal to me some so far hidden sense of my life) and then to disappear
one day (and the sense of meaning will return to its source). The resulting
feeling is that just anything can be used to organize one's experience, often
with a seemingly fantastic degree of elaboration.
During my student years I was
once told that I am like a song "66." This was a kind of subtle
insult. I do not remember this song any more, but the number has been in my
memory during all these years. I learned a seemingly rather strange kabbalistic
astrological system of 72 genii. Due to the Gregorian/Julian calendar shift, it
was certainly not calibrated for use in the 20th century. Not trying to find
out the astronomical exact shift, I just ascribed MY NUMBER 66 to my birthday.
What followed was that as if magically almost any other important dates took a
most meaningful pattern. My son was assigned 33, my former wife got 6
(complementary to 66 to reach the plenum of 72); numbers derived for some other
dates important for me were multiples of 11 as my own number [You possibly
noticed a shadow—not real emergence—of the apocalyptic "666" in the
above numbers. One is constantly to remember his/her dualistic teacher!].
Among my relatives, children almost exactly repeated one of the grandparents
etc., etc. I tried some further calculations and more and more seemingly
important coincidences emerged. Everything was suddenly speaking to me in this
new language. I found an incredibly powerful desk-top organizer for my life
during many years and then it slowly started to fade. A crazy system indeed. Maybe
not so crazy if we visualize a pentagram, symbolizing the human condition,
rotating in a circle (or circumambulating the Sun) to make five 72 day cycles
per year. This is certainly not the place to discuss any subtleties of this
scheme; let it be just one more way to be in a dialogue with the Greater Mind.
My experience tells me that one does not need to use some very esoteric ancient
system to get involved in the Dialogue. If one is ready, an adequate amount of
teaching seems to be transferred this way or another. Indeed, everything seems
to be ready to be one's Guru, or would you prefer to formulate it in terms of
selective attention? Practically, it makes no great difference, but there seems
to be no threshold in the coincidences flow between the "scientific"
and "trans-scientific" [unbelievable, life-changing coincidences]
realms.
I often felt contacts with
younger yoga practitioners in Russia to be a real disaster. Quite likely this
was partly a result of great but poorly control led/[mis-directed] powers they
had, but possibly 50% or so of it was of a different variety—a real problem of
my generation in our country. The problem was that with some of them I was
almost never able to "open" myself enough and this was certainly due
to the "paranoia" of these years that seemed to be in the very
air—everyone had some grounds to suppose that his or her partner will report
the very content of their conversations to "power structures"
[possibly not without some nasty exaggerations]. This transmuted one's life to
a fabulous spy story, but as a result, contacts between people who did not know
each other well often turned into a kind of most crazy social game of a
totalitarian variety. A good schooling for some basic artistry hidden in every
one of us, and so I suppose that quite a lot of people had a lot of fun playing
these games. Alas, in the case of my contacts with powerful Yoga
practitioners—along the same paranoiac social games lines—the result could not
be different from what they turned out to be: blocking the more than usually
powerful flow, and as a result—a feeling of tremendous pressure in the head,
sometimes even a bleeding nose.
In a hyper-dualistic &
fundamental dualistic black/white world [especially in a variant of this world
created by mass media], one would find it quite easy to consider the above
mentioned yoga practitioners as carriers of some metaphysical evil.
Transpersonally inclined scholars usually take quite an opposite stand. Watts
(1963) told of his inability to draw a perfectly evil face. I don't doubt that
in his personal world it looked so. But for a dualist, Watts himself seems to
be like one of the angels of heaven, who according to Jakob Boehme cannot see
the angels of hell because their realities do not overlap (Rainer, \991)--according
to the last stand obviously a non-dualistic state is an illusion. This view
certainly contrasts with the one by Watts. I can only envy his baseline state
of consciousness. My baseline reality is separated from the "negative
chain of realities" by a "filmiest of screens" that is quite
permeable. One needs only to look at the "Good and Evil Angels" by
Blake to feel both the invisible barrier and its semipermeability! As for me,
not only have I made acquaintance with the "lower astral reality" but
I performed exactly the task Watts was unable to do. I scribbled in a
semiautomatic manner and suddenly a most metaphysically evil face appeared on the
paper, lively and powerful. As if something evil was ready to penetrate to our
consensus reality, in a rather silly fraction of a second, I protectively
destroyed the drawing. Certainly I am quite sure that Watts would not have
recognized this face as anything particularly evil. My own experience tells me
that a best defense against these painful extreme states of a
"super-dualistic" world is just to be guided/attracted by a virtual
sense of the comical in situations like this and to shift—like in the case of
conversion of energies (Crampton, 1974; Soidla, 1995a, 1995b)—to an alternative
ASC where EVIL seems not to exist and the evil face looks just funny. But
consensus realities of most people almost certainly will include the
possibility to reach both the negative and positive worlds. The very negative
state in some superdualistic world is
just an experience waiting for every one of us behind some ill-defined corner
of consciousness even after periods of seeming triumphs over the [extremities
of] black/white, good/evil world view. I can only repeat that the vicious
circle of supportive feedback for negative states that was operating in me
these years was [to a certain degree?] a kind of illusion, something that I
[sometimes] was able to destroy by seeing a humorous side of the situation
(Soidla, 1995a, 1995b). And still negative stories/situations/states keep
returning to me (see the "man in the water" story below). To destroy
the very seeds of these experiences is a most difficult task. The negative states
seem to be always ready to pop out once more. Could we receive a collective
resistance to these negative worlds, if not for an apocalyptic 1,000 years then
at least for 50 or so [say, "new age"] years, at least as in the case
of nearly two decades during which the hypnotic analgesia and other hypnotic
phenomena seemed to lose their power (Murphy, 1992)?
Will an individual or
collective "new age" achievement still work in the world of
after-death dreams? If not--must one really worry? Possibly our human condition
of pleasure and pain is indeed a unique opportunity [even if the condition of
metaphysical good and evil is a dangerous "super-dualistic"
over-reaction?]. Maybe [perceived] dualism is a [perfect] teacher,
non-dualism--the [final] answer? I don't know. Anyway, one must be realistic
enough to feel the proper place & scale of negative experience in our real
human condition and not to deny [after centuries and decades of alternating
different biases—the virtual dimensions of] negative experience—as not
to deny the wholeness/plenum of consciousness. Maybe we are in a process of
slowly reaching some truth along a spiral of alternating dualistic and
non-dualistic illusions of various levels almost infinitely behind those who
have "tunneled" to the end-point in no time at all. But I can only
admit that among the almost limitless human powers, a power of illusion is
possibly a most remarkable one. I would admire the Great Souls, would happily
accept some seconds or minutes of seemingly absolute certainty—and still keep
open to possible alternatives. [This is a position of this very moment of
time—certainly to change after some minutes, hours, days?—I don't know.]
One must empty his/her cup to
receive some new "spiritual tea." I am ready to accept it this way—be
it due to some half-mechanical conservation laws of collective unconscious or
otherwise. Gawain (1982) is quite right suggesting "outflowing,"
giving away, as a part of the practice of "creative visualization."
As the means of local [not global] solution this book seems to be admirable.
For global solution—well, for global solution one possibly needs to be cornered
[not only to be cornered, but also "to make the proper conclusions,"
not really to make the proper conclusions, but to pass through the needle's eye
of METANOIA].
But why is the empty cup
burning? Don't You feel the powerful burning sensation, don't You see the clear
terrifying light of the possible METANOIA to come? Well ... but where is the
spiritual bullshit? Possibly I'll get some this very minute as a result of a
strange attempt to polish a mirror on an open street ... or am I a bit more
realistic just attempting to better a [mock-] Persian carpet by laying it in
your way?
I have often been surprised
how members of rather totalitarian, half-mad sects, or pupils of dangerous,
seemingly most ego-tripping teachers, can be pure, almost as emitting a kind of
spiritual light. A mistake of mine concerning these sects and spiritual
teachers? Or is it that just everyone will get the fruits he/she deserves, both
the teachers, and the devotees? A kind of economy of Great Mind—happily giving
pure teachings even via evil intellects—as if their not so pure intentions did
not exist at all. An impressive picture, if one likes this kind of devotional
metaphors. I do ... quite often!
During recent years, two
authorities had a great influence on me: Buber (1958) who taught me to see
properly and feel the highest value of the I-Thou relationship, and Harding
(1972), who taught me [let's say] that we have no head (would you like to
suppose this to be a koan or what?). These were two bright spots in the field
of my rather dim spiritual understanding. A bit subliminally painful
situations, but separate they remained. And then one day I understood that the
"I" that has no head is the "I" of I-Thou relationship. And
the ratio-dominated human ground of "I-with head" is just the
"I" of I-He/She. Not a great achievement, but possibly encouraging?
Two memorable
Utopian dreams: Hyperborean Shambhala and Hotel Europe. A black sea gull dream.
The emerging (difficult to resist) formulations of other people's problems (of
these painful vicious circles of mind). There is an answer for everyone.
Conditioning of Purusha. Prakriti charming and dancing. "The man in the
water" story. A Megaphone Solo. On Tantric gifts. On intensity of preventive
coincidences flow. Some personal words on the [painful] ugliness of being a
sinner. Looking at the Sky together. (La-la. Ha-ha [by the man in the street .
. . and by Buddha-Heruka] and Al-Ah [of prayer]. Ya-ha-av-[aaa]h . . .
"La-bo-ra": ascending by descending steps, a powerful paradox
possibly feeding the very Western civilization we are so used to. Towards some
future schou-roum-bouroum: "al-ab-ar-{ay-ah}-au[m].") On responsibility.
The Logic [Locus. Lotus] of Timeless. When I started my "third
eye" training (Sakharov, 1993), the very first effects—before some
dramatic developments I told about in parts 1 and 2 of this paper (Soidla,
1995a, 1995b)—were related to activating my dream life. Dreams were memorable,
colored bright; the plot was usually quite soap-opera level, but some feeling
of importance was certainly added, as if all the trivialities were seen for the
very first time with most fresh, child-like eyes. On this background, some
dreams nevertheless were felt as something "special." One of them
started in a beautifully silent cosmos. Our "cosmoplane" was damaged
in a Star Wars-like incident (this was the last vestige of something like a
plot) and we started descending back to Earth. What followed was a most
majestic view of future Earth that I was seeing with unmistakably XXth century
eyes of surprise. All the territory of the USA was covered with a giant roof,
having been turned into a production plant, as a silent voice seemed to tell
me. All Europe was a giant hotel. Our hotel room windows were one mile high
above a blue Mediterranean sea, but from my bathroom I had a direct path to
the Arctic ice. I was well conscious how breathtakingly impossible and new it
was. The Arctic that I saw was rather special, maybe really a border between
"real" and mystical realms, a Hyperborean Shambhala-like world
(Bernbaum, 1980). Another dream of mine took me a bit further along these [or
some quite independent?] lines. It started at something like an Arctic ocean
shore with rainbow-colored, glittering small ice crystals everywhere in the air
above the white snow-covered coast. (Possibly this world—at least some parts of
it—was a psycho-physical world of absent or suppressed white color synthesis as
discussed in Tart, 1975.) But the ocean seemed to be quite strangely not
covered by ice. After a blank I saw an island, in some not quite specified way
related to the previous scene. The very special glittering quality of the
arctic air of the dream was still present, but it was quite warm and the center
of the island was occupied by a lake of almost tropical warm blue tint. A kind
of old-fashioned [not futuristic, strange, but in a way familiar] hydroplane
was landing on the lake. Some strange direct inner knowledge [the strangeness
of this seemed to be perceived even in the dream] told me of large underground
laboratories; they emerged, also a bit old-fashioned and at the same time
familiar, then the image faded. Some special "nourishing" quality of
these dreams, especially of the last one, remained with me. Was some
"Shambhala archetype" behind all these dream-experiences, as well as
behind the Shambhala-dreams reported by Bernbaum (1980)?
Sometimes dreams seem to be closely related to
some following event, in a way preparing one for a coming emotional turmoil,
providing a new "feeling-tone" beforehand. This feels like that in a
way opposite to normal memory recording . . . something pre-recorded
[inherited] and still virtual in a not edited part of memory engram first
starts with clothing into personal mythological and associative memory stuff
[as witnessed in dreams], and only after this preparation stage appears as a
full-grown real physical event. It was so with the man in the water story.
(This story will follow soon.) It was also so before the magical and hazardous
summer solstice events at Vuoksa I wrote about in the earlier parts of this
paper. I had a dream of flight, but this was a rather special flight. I was
flying in slow large circles with some tens of fellow-birds, that seemed to be
sea gulls judging by the pattern of their flight. I remembered a strange
half-darkness—as if during white nights—a not so usual kind of light during
dreams. When seeing the sea gulls circling above the water mill at Vuoksa at
midnight I recognized the scene. Later, after being in a situation of
ultimate—both metaphysical and physical—hazard, I had some grounds to perceive
all this as a kind of an alternative future (say, of having been killed, and
"reincarnated" as a sea gull) that had been waiting for me (or,
more realistically speaking, exists just as an extra dimension of my life
story—in the experiential realm of dreams, synchronicities, psychic episodes,
physically possible in some "hybrid" half-personal/half-mythological
associative memory engram): A kind of imaginary alternative future, unreal,
and at the same time in my memory seemingly so real, as a kind of construction
that is made in a way my brain is so used to applying, say, in reconstructing a
time dimension of evolutionary history I use in my lectures on molecular
evolution. A friend of mine (let's name her G.M.) after listening to this story
many years ago asked me, after seemingly having a kind of inner fight—to ask or
not to ask—and what was the color of these sea gulls? This question surprised
me, but immediately I knew the answer: they were black (dark). So possibly
these sea gulls existed both as a figure of collective unconscious (one level
of truth) and as a personal message (or insight) of mine (another level of
truth). Certainly one never can be sure with anything like this, but there is
possibly some sense in trying to collect the trivial everyday stories of this
kind—seemingly pointing towards something—to fill a wastebasket for some
possibly successful treasure hunters of tomorrow (see Soidla, 1995b). The very
kind of painful expression on the face of G.M. when asking me the question
about the color of the sea gulls of my dream reminded me of the same expression
of G.G., a former occultist, now orthodox Christian (this has been the path for
many people involved in the transpersonal and the spiritual here in Russia).
Several times I witnessed how she was involved in some social or spiritual
exchange, but with a growing expression of some pain [possibly just because
of the very impossibility of not telling until now something quite odd]--and
then she told It! Usually this was some painful thing—an isolated train of
recurrent thoughts I [or other people in the room] had in mind but were not
inclined to tell anyone. I must admit, that I tried no formal experiments with
this ability of hers.
According to Evans-Wentz
(1960), a Buddha-Heruka will approach us in the "Bardo of becoming"
singing something like La-la and Ha-ha. These may seem to be most silly syllables
from a fierce deity [but certainly one must see it himself/herself before
coming to any conclusions]. Or one can suppose that these "words"
[seed-syllables] are just the right ones to attack our very Being—[La] and
Speech/[Mind]—[Ha], taking into account that these syllables correspond to the
"seeds" traditionally connected with the root [Muladhara] and throat
[Visuddha] chakras (Leadbeater, 1971; Woodroffe, 1928/1972). For the man in the
street [like me] La-la seems certainly to be connected with a complex of
feelings related to some basic joy-energy of life [something possibly reached
by a loving & kind variety of "dirty talk"] and Ha-ha to a
feeling of seemingly limitless [verbal] intellectual power [superiority]— see
the two first stories in the very beginning of the first part of this paper
(Soidla, 1995 a). One can try to feel a difference between these La-la and
Ha-ha and of the same letters in a bit different order as Al-ah. The last word
feels just by itself as a most sincere prayer to something much higher than
Humankind. [Do you feel it?] One can try to feel the in a way descending,
"materialistic" overtones in the syllables la-ba-ra-ya-ha-mo and
correspondingly ascending and "overcoming" in the mirrored syllables
al-ab-ar-ay-ah-om—in a way connected with the 6 chakras from mula to ajna
(Leadbeater, 1971; Woodroffe, 1928/1972). Are not these syllables internalized
in the Indo-European languages giving the basic WORK: la-bo-ra [ay] (as in
"laboratory") for the curious western activity of trying to ascend by
descending steps? The dramatic realm of chakras is possibly not so exotic
and unrelated to Western mentality. In "The Last Judgment" world by
Blake one sees the 4 lower chakras along the central line (sushumna): Mula (the
cave of Dragon with seven heads), Swadisthana (Harlot), Manipura (Angels of
Glory) and Anahata (Christ) between the channels of Ida and Pingala: ascending
flow of resurrection of the just (right side) and fall of the wicked (left
side). Upper chakras obviously belong to an after-last-judgment world. To
feel the "dialectics" of the basic ascending and descending steps can
help with personal spiritual exercises, but certainly these possible ancient
overtones are powerful enough to amplify our unreadiness, misconceptions, maybe
even magnify the dust on the inner mirror to become seemingly real rocks to
fall on us. Happy are those who know that there is no mirror, no dust. Others
must better polish the mirror. It is one of the last mentioned ones—like me—who
is better to remember about not mixing the traditions [techniques] (Soidla,
1995a) of all the so often neglected ABCs of spiritual development [exemplified
by the first two "limbs" of the Ashtanga Yoga (Taimni, 1974)].
Anyway, if one is not carried away by egotistic [and naive] magic aspirations,
he or she can well benefit by activating one's innate sense of language as a
powerful sacred realm.
During recent years the number of my powerful negative experiences has
possibly decreased a bit. The following is an example of one of the "late
negative stories" of mine. What makes the story rather interesting--at
least for me--is a long period of "foretaste" of some coming horror
and the involvement of both my wife and I—and indirectly also S.S.—in this
story. There is a small pool near our Institute, a rather dirty, but, in a way,
"magical place" in some very loose sense (one sometimes seems to
catch a strange expression on the faces of people, some tension seems sometimes
to be in the very air). It was a typical St. Petersburg autumn, a time of cold
winds and first ice at the shore. I had a night of hectic dreams and
half-nightmares. Morning felt strangely ominous and at the same time there was
a sense of rather tense alertness. My wife and I passed the pool and then we
noticed a strange man drinking water ... or what? His head was in the water,
but his legs were moving in a strange way. We passed him, but a backward glance
confirmed that he still had his head in water. We took his legs and pulled him
to a dry place: he felt strangely very light, as if not quite a real human
being. We called for medical first aid. The feeling that something ominous,
unreal, special, was with us and persisted during all of this story. And then,
in my Institute after 2-3 hours I got a package from S.S. Several photocopies,
and among them some pages and title of a book by Rosenblatt (I994):
"The Man in the Water." A synchronicity "prepared"
by a foretaste of ominous energies, by a kind of "echo" of the event
to come. A kind of singularity-to be followed by quite "normal" days
and months—that is obviously still with me as a kind of possibility of future
stories along the same lines, in the after-final dreams, maybe.
Retracing my own steps.
Childhood: fears, visions, black worlds. Magic that seemed to work in the classroom.
One must pay for everything. In search of the Leading Edge. The experiment that
really works: Molecular Genetics. Science and Spirituality. An arrogant youth.
A story of Monkey Art. Transpersonal Studies—how exciting! Meeting A.V. In the
healer's room. A photo of Bhagavan, On having entered the Stream. All this is a
part of a life story. One never returns. This is an attempt to scan
quickly for some key moments of my life. I remember that my childhood was rich
in religious sentiments, mostly due to my grandmother. They disappeared after
some years seemingly leaving no trace. But I remember frightful appearances in
the night and hot childish prayers to keep them away. At the same time
fantasies of being guilty in some mystical sense, even of being damned, started
haunting me. I never thought of myself as a demonic hero:
no pride of being damned, only the horror of it. Also I noticed—or
imagined--surges of ill feelings during religious holidays. This was a kind of
materialization of my mixture of childish religiosity with strong archetypical
shadow components, that grew even stronger with first sexual fantasies and
corresponding feelings of guilt—and were a dominant feeling during so many
years. Maybe connected with this were fantasies of living in black worlds that
were perceived as a kind of return to Home (Womb?). Anyway I was inclined to
interpret all this also as a part of my congenital metaphysical defect,
something that I was never able to change, of being a child of darkness [that I
did not like at all]. At quite a young age I started reading books about
science, and soon I felt most
rationalistic, hostile to anything spiritual,
but at the same time quite open to negative mystical fantasies. I remember a
seemingly not too significant story that exerted—against my own will—a rather
deep impression. An old man, a relative of our neighbors, asked me where the
Solar system came from and who sends us dreams, if there is no God? I answered
these simple questions with all the possible arrogance of book-learning, and
then he neared his dark almost toothless mouth and with drops of saliva
presented a secret most important message: "You can tell any stories like
this, but I know that God appeared before me as a White Wall." I was
dumbfounded. I attempted to wear it off, to ridicule this experience of mine by
retelling it to my friends. (No exaggeration was really needed.) But this
experience is still with me, a challenge I could not meet, an unhealed wound.
In school I was rather rationalistic, but certainly naive, awkward and often
beaten by my schoolmates. At the same time I had a definite feeling (most
likely an illusion, a childish fantasy, but maybe not 100% so) that I am able
to manipulate my teachers to question me only when I really know what to say.
This way or another, I was rather successful in school, but with a definite
feeling that it all was undeserved and that the beating I got from my peers was
in some mystical way related to my Guilt, that Nature itself was involved in
executing me according to some all-knowledgeable and just High Court decision.
As a result I spent all these years with a feeling that I have no right to be
successful and tried never to learn how to be rationally manipulative. (I
manipulated people, but this was always an irrational, repressed, and
"forbidden" activity.) I lived with a heavy hand of the Collective
Unconscious on the back of my head.
After a long illness that I
badly needed, I continued on at school with different classmates, and in place
of the former feedback stabilized Hell, it was a rather normal life, if not to
count being too involved in daydreams (both sexual and concerned with my future
fame) instead of working hard. But formally I was rather successful and in a
way quite a happy schoolboy. The same is true about my University years.
Certainly, I was awkward, only very slowly growing out of my provinciality (I
have not quite succeeded with this even now, after 45 or so years, but I never
allowed myself to try seriously getting rid of it—on a rational level). I was
rather late realizing that I really want to be at a Leading Edge, not only in
my fantasies, but in real life. The very choice of molecular genetics for my
graduate studies was dictated by this wish, but also by a wish to be in a kind
of "legal opposition": when I started my graduate studies in 1963
Trofim Lysenko and his "Mitchurinist genetics" was still a dominant
force in our country. What I discovered soon was even more valuable. Genetics
provided a way of making experiments that really worked, were repeatable and
allowed interpretation in terms of simple molecular models. The rationalist in
me could not ask for anything better than this. Nevertheless, I always longed
for some quite different field of inquiry (but maybe—of experience?). So I gathered
my fellow geneticists to discuss a recent book by Desmond Morris (1962) on
apes' drawings. These were the years of ideological thaw in our country,
nevertheless, my seminar created some problems for the head of my department.
Years later I was told, that the incident was discussed at a communist party
district committee level.
After some years I noticed a "leading
edge" topic that later turned out to be not just one more topic of this
kind, but something really alternative--complementary to my involvement with a
"real" science like genetics. This was the field of transpersonal
psychology that came to my attention in the early '70s. I perceived
transpersonal texts as something most nourishing for some part of my
personality that had been dormant for so many years, but this interest seemed
still to be dominated by my mind, still to be not connected with my total being
[to wholeness of my being]. But somewhere, under the surface of the
intellectual level, a process of metamorphosis, something much more basic than
I could imagine during these years possibly started unfolding. I made the
acquaintance of A.V., a Kabbalist and Magus. The very way his Mind worked was a
surprise for me. Even more important was that what started as a quite innocent
superficial imitation of some seemingly pure artistic traits of him taught me
some badly needed basic lessons of "esoteric psychologies" (see
Soidla, 1995a). Being a psycho-catalyst of my metamorphosis he was never really
touched by my problems (that, by the way, I never told him). It was also during
these years that I came across a portrait that created a strange feeling of
being—in some irrational way—most important for me. This was a portrait of Sri
Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi (see Cohen, 1974). I have never succeeded in mastering
Bhagavan's system of self inquiry, but his beneficial subtle influence has been
with be for 20 years or so (and has now taken quite tangible form through
classes led by a most remarkable yogi, Oleg Mogilever—that I am more or less
regularly attending). If A.V. was—in a way—a source of inner knowledge and
energy (maybe I still miss some important point), then Ramana certainly was a
catalyst of purification, of peeling away layers of dead spiritual tissue. Of
many other important challenges of these years I would like to mention here
some meetings with Mr. Linnik, a St. Petersburg healer. He was not only most
devoted to his noble task, but also has managed to create a subtly impressive
environment with violins in different stages of completion and with a dark far
corner with icons and healthy green plants that seemed to feed on spiritual
energy.
I was not conscious of having
entered a "stream," but here I found myself, more and more aware of
its powerful spiritual flow (N.B. What a productive metaphor the taoist-like
"flow" has become during the last 10 у ears or so [Csikszentmihalyi, 1990]), but also--of
having made one mistake after another, having been stopped by one rock after
another (hence the increase of awareness about the flow?)--with a more
and more insistent feeling of total failure. [A "punctuated flow" it
has been.] And at the same time there was no way back. I was certainly
searching for something quite different (some romantic "spiritual
happiness," maybe). But there is no way back and this is good. Maybe
better to say: this is right, this is something Real.
Barely visible
Paths of Help. Some more Hope. Sri Bhagavan and OM. The gift of Rainbow. A
remarkable man. The story continues. Space, spirituality and developing of
Siberia. Transpersonal geopolitics. "Power structures" as street
gangs: in a civilized world one usually does not get involved in their
problems. The dimensions of Paranoia Unlimited. The Past of the Mind (= MEMORY)
is the Future of the Body. On Pluralism, on the Truth above the concept of One
Truth, on our inability to conceive the One Truth and how a toilet spat upon my
face to answer this philosophy of TRUTH, or—even a contemporary prophet [S-n] is
not mocked. [Or even: on clearing the mirror/on washing one's face. Who makes
the attempt?]
What has been my practice here
during recent years? Alas, even no "formal" churchgoing. A passage of
Bible [almost] every evening + a prayer, and notably 15 or so evenings with Sri
Ramana devotees guided by a remarkable Yogi, the translator and poet Oleg
Mogilever (OM). And a constantly returning feeling that every small step of
mine counts in one way or another.
To continue my story—in 1994 I
had a fantastic—a? least for me—trip to Hawaii to my old transpersonal
friend, S.S. Possibly, some day we'll attempt a detailed comparison of our
experiences during this time and maybe even to write down some crosscultural
[transcontinental] pages about these days. Here I would attempt telling the
following story. I visited a HEIAU (ancient Hawaiian sacred ground) at the
North Shore part of Oahu. It was a place to shatter my conceptions of sanctity
and spirituality, at least showing how limited is my understanding. The Heiau was
radiating a most improbable fiery energy reminiscent of stories of the volcanic
goddess Pele—but not as a kind of nice story, but powerful, superhuman, both
ultimately dangerous and ultimately kind—in a strange unbelievable way;
something so absurdly and clearly beyond our
human capacities and limits and so real, real, real as I stood at the stone
platform. The force behind the HEIAU seemed to be impersonally all-powerful [on
the Hawaiian Islands], and at the same time a kind of personality, but a much greater
personality than I, beyond any comparison. [How pale all these words are to
describe the most intensive flow of experience during these few minutes.] I
had the freedom to make a decision— and to face the consequences. I offered a
small item in a ti-leaf as D.L.—my guide into the Hawaiian life—suggested, and
felt that Asking for something this very moment needs all my responsibility. To
ask something FOR ME felt a bit out of the question. I was only a guest—and I
had to behave like a guest. So in my thoughts I attempted just to communicate
my best wishes to the islands, asking just to be accepted. Immediately a
feeling emerged [and slowly started growing] that in a way I had acted more or
less appropriately. I still felt that every thought and step of mine must be
very careful, but in a way I was accredited. Now up to this day I had still not
seen rainbows, so famous in Hawaiian skies. It was not a surprise but a kind of
opening of my soul towards a long awaited benign sign when on my way back I saw
a display of a rainbow formed first as a bubble in the distance and then slowly
taking form. In the next days double and triple rainbows followed. It was not
only a beautiful welcome to a now accepted guest, seeing all this was also in a
way a sign of high permission to be really there.
Many parts of my own country
seem to be very beautiful, spiritual places. Take, for example, Lake Baikal and
Angara River. It seems to be incredible--these powerful masses of purest water,
as if some sources of original purity have opened in one's heart. The humble,
glorious, one almost says "waiting" space of Siberia seems to be
ready to accommodate huge communities of different kinds of spiritual
seekers-like the many rooms in our Father's house. Spiritual compartmentalization
could be a slogan for our country in the XXIst century to tap new energies, to
open totally new ways toward a future non-antagonistic and creative Russia.
Most likely a dream only, due to all the pressing "political
realities." These energy draining dangerous "realities" are a
kind of political paranoia of these days, something that one would better not
to be involved in--as one is usually not involved in battles between street
gangs. (Adults usually manage not to identify with any of them.) Mature spirituality
is the only geopolitics that would really work in Russia. This is one of the
few basic things I believe.
In a real life situation, any
speculations have an additional dimension, a kind of commentary [that can
teach, confuse or tell a lie according to the most wise "I Ching."
But one seems to be able to tell one from another when he/she wants it!].
Political passions are high in Russia. So one day I found myself in a conversation—in
my mind—with a Russian Nobel prize winner and former dissident—S-n. He has said
in his most controversial recent paper that all the Western ideas of pluralism
are just crazy. There is only one truth, the truth of God; one must try to
reach this one truth and not to search for pseudo-conceptions like pluralism.
Something like this. Certainly it is difficult to read things like this and
continue to remain in inner calm. [So maybe really it was not an inner
conversation, possibly just a quarrel?] I started this "inner
discussion" with rather primitive newspaper-level arguments, then some
subtler ones came. After getting to a concept of TRUTH above a concept of one
truth (something non-dualistic), I, in a way, congratulated myself—and
now I must confess that I was involved in this hot philosophical argumentation
in my toilet room (possibly one of the best places for philosophical
exercises)—and exactly at the very second of my self-congratulations, my
toilet—as possibly only Russian toilets can do—spat back in my face something
not too pure. What a powerful answer to my arguments! I was "stopped"
(Castaneda, 1974). Need I to add that even contemporary saints are certainly
not to be mocked--even if they talk about some seemingly damned
demagogic things. Sorry. But what is more important is the "spiritual
aftertaste" of such a story. Not a knowledge, certainly, something more
tangible. Something that all my body seems to know[?], maybe something that
is with my very Self, something that possibly has always been there but only
now is allowed to be partly open for me . . . .
Here I would relate one other
story about the mysterious ways of spiritual materialism and of the forces [of
consciousness, of the Great Mind] helping one to overcome .... I was
thinking about some formulations for this paper on my way home. "How
beautiful are the faces of people who fail." I thought of a colleague of
mine whose life seemed to be a collection of strange stories of failure. Well,
I would better say "How beautiful are often . . . ." This very
moment the package in my hands burst and the bag with products worth my
half-week salary was at my feet, in dust. Whoops! How beautiful it is to
learn from scenes like this. What a Comedy of Consciousness! Possibly I would
name my new paper this way: "Whoops! What a Clownery of
Consciousness!"
I would add one
more short story that in my associative memory engrams seems to be related to
the above incident. On the very evening after writing down the above story, my
wife and I noticed a large beetle on our wall. I tried to find some glassware
to take the beetle out of the room. Whoops! It smashed to nasty smallest
pieces! And the beetle slowly found its way to some safe and quiet place.
"You see, as a mock Zen teacher I expressed my opinion . . ."—
"about the beetle" my wife quickly finished the sentence for me. (Am
I to add that we almost never speak about "spiritual matters"?)
Learning to live
with one's madness. Painful attempts of articulating. Am I not a madman?
Certainly I am, at least during some special hours [minutes, seconds]. In a way
I have been a madman all my life with some oscillations around my [rather
biased] baseline. In a way this is what one pays for the rare glimpses of
transpersonal realities. How is one to survive among the onslaughts of one's
madness? From one side there stands a rule of Solzhenitsyn, a distillation of
his forced labor camp survival experience: don't expect [hope], don't trust
[believe], don't ask [for anything]. But one must not take the comedy element
out of the "black comedy" of a madman's [human] life. Seeing the funny
humorous side of the action cuts through invisible threads of the puppet show
[and even in the worst case gives some extra time before the next act of the
play].
Here follow some painful
attempts of articulating. A [feeling-tone of the] "glass bead
game" (Hesse, 1969) allows one not to take either the current scientific
world-view or the views suggested by alternative sciences too seriously. Later
postmodernism theories seem—from my point of view—to have added a touch of
young over-enthusiasm and at the same time of gravity to this possibility that
was so graciously opened by Hesse. Younger people cannot be quite organic in
the old-man-world like this that is no more safely reality-anchored but
seems to balloon—now popping in and now popping out of the picture—in a kind of
spiritual thin air.
Being "psi-positive"
I have always been better with the spoken word than with the written one. Quite
recently I learned that possibly I have grown able to communicate some
"energy/thought packets" in written form.
There are minutes when even
the best real attempts at holistic descriptions (e.g., Bohm, 1980) seem to have
"fixed some parameters" with the effect of blocking the flow. The
holistic—that one is often longing for—may be even describable, but certainly
seems not to have been described so far. Maybe waiting for some better future
languages, indeed, it is nevertheless communicated by
"meta-linguistic means" via consciousness altering
("poetical") texts, parables, teaching stories, and almost certainly
also by the books of Bohm that I do not quite comprehend.
Are not we--scientists [implicitly] trained to
"bracket" the wholeness to be able to work with local causal effects
of our experiments? Doesn't "scientific"—for most of us these
days--really mean "not holistic" [not transpersonal]?
Why does the practice of the
first steps of Patanjali (Ashtanga) yoga help lifting one above his/her
personal Pandora box effect (of [w]holistic transmutation of one's [mis]attempt
of spiritual practice to a Job-like "spiritual punishment")? Maybe
one needs to consider the possibility that the first and second editors
(Soidla, 1995b, 1995с, 1995d) are now-if
not united-then at least acting in accord.
If dreams are hybrid
structures between mythological stuff and one's personal life story, then these
hybrids [revealing the structure of underlying hybrid associative memory
engrams] are as if specially designed to demonstrate the logic of memory
editing and the components involved. For a beginning one must possibly add
middle and high abstraction level associative memory engrams to the picture.
(For one's [half-] waking state learning stories one certainly must add a
feedback loop from the realm of one's high abstraction level—spiritual
achievement—associative memory engrams [Soidla, 1993b, 1993с, 1995а, 1995b].)
The teaching and learning
cycle seems to be just here in this world as a pattern of the unedited memory
engram. This pattern apparently brings forth some kinds of situations and
events, even with great souls, when unfolding THEIR prerecorded LIFE STORY
TEXT. One needs only to read the stories on Zen and Taoist masters to recognize
this. This [part of] personal karma has its own logic that one usually cannot
[and then need not] interfere with—when being still in his/her human body. It
just occurs.
If one needs some teaching
she/he gets it! Only he/she must be attentive to read the text of coincidences
("events and things") written by [Great] Mind [in his/her mind]. This
seems to be a result of selective [creative] attention plus something very
personal (there is a feeling of some [Great] one being present day and night).
In a way there seems to be a
HELP function in every INDIVIDUAL LIFE computer game program.
A daydream image: tiny people
between giant mountains of Memory [of the collective unconscious/collective
experience?].
One can build one's soul only
after having surrendered. If not—one builds something quite different—one's EGO
[say, like a Pharisee]. In other words, this small difference possibly
determines what kind of high abstraction level associative memory engram one
builds. But maybe it is not a simple biochemical decision, rather a kind of
particle/wave complementarity "collapsing" when observed at the last
judgment [when the high abstraction level associative memory engrams get a
final label]. Hence the Great Sinner/Great Saint builds "something"
that will get its proper name, its resolution, only when time and eternity
meet, maybe in one's memory/consciousness with its first and second editor,
maybe in a moment of singularity of human history, maybe both.
The book of Chuang Tzu fell
down and—as if by itself—opened on the floor. I wanted to learn what Chuang Tzu
was kindly trying to communicate to me. I lifted the book. It was open at two
blank pages.
A tremendous amount of everyday
work is needed even to build a criminal, evil soul.
Humor (comic spirit, crazy
wisdom) tests any identification, cuts through [non-mature] [mis]
identifications. What does one need to cut through? Possibly not everything
(by the way, would one REALLY succeed with a task like this?). Anyway, one is
better to test some most important things him/herself—if not for any other
reason then to be ready for the after-death final testing [by collective
unconscious, Great Mind, . . .]. Of course, one seems not to have any need for
this kind of apology of Humor--via a feeling of the presence of Death-in our
days. (Possibly what one needs is just the opposite--a kind of apology of Death
via Humor? Not considering Humor as a way to live in the [perceived, remembered]
presence of one's Death, but Death as a final way to work with some basic
Cosmic Humor of existence?) But . . . who really knows?
The same current coincidences
flow pattern [like a fractal geometry pattern] penetrates every activity. When
the pattern changes, it is like the very world one lives in undergoes a
dramatic change. One can probe the pattern by divination. One can be very
sensitive or get used to the change. The change can be along the lines of
developing "one's fate" and be written down in the unedited part of
one's memory and/or in astrological constellations, and/or in the lines of
one's hand. Then the change is anticipated by one's unconscious and one needs a
higher power of awareness to notice it. One's really free actions make drastic,
only too often most unexpected changes, so well known to [many] spiritual
practitioners.
Unedited memory is a part of
unconscious sharing of this "compartment" with some repressed edited
memory, memory-like service texts and other similar "dynamic
structures." Unedited memory uses the same pathways [service functions,
"psychic energy," dream realm] as other unconscious stuff to
communicate with and to condition conscious parts of one's Psyche.
It is important to listen to
people who make mistakes, who are [almost] wrong—at least to see the emerging
patterns of collective unconscious.
Mistakes are something that
one sees [with "soft eyes" (Leonard, 1978)?] immediately, at very
first glance, obviously not having [consciously] read the text.
Transpersonal is a label for a certain spiritual travelers' club or—in
the best case--for a not quite responsible but friendly travel bureau.
Spiritual travel itself is beyond any labels like this.
Possibly I am not only cornered but rather
trapped in the classical alchemic tower of 49 [or was it 50?] entrances and no
exit. What is left is a spiritual vertical axis, ascending or descending. One
can prefer speaking about transmuting the very substance of one's dream so that
no tower confining one's experience remains: just expanding space of some Vita
Nuova, strangely familiar and yet brand new, possibly.
As we are so far from the final Synthesis [at
some Omega point], the human [not machine-like] nature of ours is best served
rather by the art of breakthroughs towards the final shining Reality than by
the science & philosophy of creating new and better but still so dim and
awareness-limiting systems?
For a scientist's aspect of myself, all the
parts of this text of mine that were originally written in different [but
not essentially discrete/major] states of consciousness have been a source
of constant amusement [and I myself—the "hero" of this story—have
in a way been an ultimate bug to be studied]. Something of this attitude I
certainly accept and have attempted to share here. But the "whole me"
denies the extremities of this view and has even allowed to make the text more
"coherent" at the expense of some too exotic statements that were
censured during the preparation of this paper. The result is exactly what it
is: a collection of perennial/personal interface stories & symbols. I have
also shared some most controversial moments of attempting to touch the
collective master picture of reality with my brush for some changes of shape
& shade. Here you have the result of all this—a text that is living with me
as a kind of parallel life story; anyway, not a skeleton, but a body, maybe
even a Being fighting, say, homewards, sometimes with my help, but often
seemingly as if by itself.
Fasting and Prayer. On
spiritual fasting. The watch stopped. WHO teaches the science of Silence?
Reaching the Great Step. The End and its Dreams. Some very simple things:
leaving, arriving, staying. The Rest is—Silence? I am really not good at
fasting and my prayer is certainly not what it must and can be. But certainly
fasting and prayer are among the best, most powerful things one can have in
his/her/its life [maybe, indeed, even "its"?—if one remembers the
feeling of the "prayer of mountains, prayer of holy spots"].
Soon only my past, only
the 1st [1,001st?] time edited life story will remain for me with a few seeds
of possible future changes. Keeping all this almost constantly in mind I have
not grown any better as a human being [a bit more thoughtful? maybe]. It seems
to be strange, but maybe even not too strange. There are other, more notable
effects, apparently not depending on my awareness/effort. One day I realized my
being in a process of curious comical descending towards the final Step with a
flock of early slips of the tongue & memory, everyday reminders of
my state, sclerotic local stops of mind, and new difficulties in formulating.
This means that I have already started shifting towards the ultimate dream
reality where I'll possibly roam much more helpless, regardless of all my
seemingly unhesitant readiness to study the unreductionistic patterns of my
life & mind during these years. Maybe this bold understanding is still
better than an illusion of being able to continue without any Help? (Maybe
not.) But will I ever continue? I have learned some seemingly rather spiritual
and profound answers, I have read [and, alas, spoken] a lot about the survival
research, out-of-body experience, books of the dead. And still I don't know. I
seem to trust in the basic underlying silence responsive to every action and
thought of mine . . . but once more I don't know how deep this sometimes
seemingly total trust of mine is. Most of the time I am not in command of my
dreams and my dream "I" seems to be as uneducated as many years ago
before my transpersonal journey started. How will it be in the [post-] final
dreams of mine? Again and again, I don't know. Anyway, this way or another,
it's rather likely that I'll soon taste the fruits of consummation—of my folly
in this lifetime. I cannot say that it all could not have been different ....
How tired I feel quite often during these last years. Is there a rest? I don't
know . . . [The] REST IS
Mr. Biochemistry [the very
logic of the biochemistry of memory editing] warns:
there MUST be a periodic
function that is not written down in the in-time part of Memory, that must be
in a way TIMELESS. (The same can be true for the ["guide,"
"mythological"] memory texts interacting with the timeless parts of
the master memory record. Most likely they bridge the in-time and timeless parts. ) And now
some more words about my hypothesis of memory. First, the ideas that I develop
are not really an alternative to other hypotheses/[almost] theories on synaptic
strength modification, neuronal groups training, etc., up to "global
mapping"--"neural Darwinism" (Edelman, 1992; Stryker, 1990).
What I want to say here is that one must be open to the possibility that there
exists a mechanism of creating macromolecular [RNA?] records of neuron activity
patterns operating with two main symbols [nucleotides; 1-2 additional symbols
-nucleotides functioning as periodic "commas" = synchronization
signals] at constant rate--at speeds ca. 40Hz--and conjugated with a mechanism
of post-syn-thetic editing—filling in the "commas" with additional
repetitive material (Soidla, 1993b, 1993с, 1995а, 1995b, 1995с, 1995d). This
mechanism is important during short-term memory recording and possibly
predominant during long term memory creating but in both cases it is certainly
just one component of a much more complex apparatus [just a missing link—to
make the models really work].
On the metaphysical and
transpersonal levels I would like to stress that at least the
"compartments" of memory and consciousness seem to overlap [I would
not like even to attempt to discuss some high level theory necessary to discuss
the connection on any deeper level]. What I want to note here is that the
repeated synchronization signals in short-term memory record and/or repeated
elements in the inherited "human life story" record are also
biochemically needed to allow the editing mechanism to work—as one needs to
provide some universal "signals" recognized by editor
["guide"] memory [RNA] molecules. This means that the very logic of memory
editing leads to the existence of two different—in-time and timeless-parts of
memory record [the last, timeless, ones being situated within synchronization
signals]. Maybe one is allowed to suppose that in-time and timeless editing
were uncoupled at some important point in history—weakening the timeless
memory/consciousness control over [or better: integration with] human
mind/behavior, introducing a [quasi-] dualism for our very being. Then our aim
would possibly be ... to reach a [Kingdom of a new] link between in-time
and timeless parts of our memory/consciousness via making (or better—using
some subtle timeless guidance by Great Mind in us [by the very Quality of our
being in the world] for creating) the high abstraction level associative
memory texts that will get involved in memory editing in such a way as to make
a new bridge between the in-time and timeless in [and outside of] us.
Fruits, flowers, no
time. flow. space, silence. Faces made of flowers and fruits. Fruit landscapes in
a flower space. No bang, no whimper. It still flows. It is still a flow here.
It flows. No rest, no silence, rest is, silence is.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I would like
to thank Sam Shapiro for a most sensitive and compassionate editing of all
three parts of this manuscript, and my wife, Olga, for sharing important
metaphors and questions. I must also thank Jim Fadiman for his encouraging and
revealing comments on the first draft of parts 1 and 2 of this paper. Jack
Grant for opening my eyes and ears to some seed dimensions of the English
language, and A.V. for his friendship. Certainly none of the above bears any
responsibility for the extravagant views expressed in my paper.
REFERENCES
Bernbaum, E. (1980). The
way to Shambhala. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness
and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. New York:
Scribner's.
Castaneda, C. (1974). Journey to Ixtlan.
New York: Pocket Books.
Cohen, S. S. (1974). Guru Ramana.
Tiruvannamalai, India: Sri Ramanasramam. Crampton, M. (1974). Psychological
energy transformations: Developing positive
polarization.
Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 6, 39-56.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The
psychology of optimal experience. New
York: Harper & Row.
Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of
the mind. New
York:
Basic Books.
Evans-Wentz, W. Y. (Ed. & Trans.). (1960). The
Tibetan Book of the Dead.
London: Oxford
University Press.
Gawain, S. (1982). Creative
visualization. New York: Bantam Books.
Guenther, H. V.
(1989). From reductionism to creativity. Boston: Shambhala.
Harding, D. E.
(1972). On having no head. New York: Harper & Row.
Hesse, H. (1969). The
glass bead game. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Jahn, R.
G., & Dunne, B. J. (1987). Margins of reality. New York: Harcourt,
Brace, Jovanovich.
Krippner,
S. (Ed.). (1972). The plateau experience: A. H. Maslow and others. Journal
of Transpersonal Psychology, 4, 107-120.
Leadbeater, С. W. (1971). The chakras. London: Theosophical
Publishing House.
Leonard, G. (1978).
The silent pulse. New York: Dutton.
Lewis, C. S.
(1991). The problem of pain. Moscow: Gnosis. (Russian translation)
Morris, D. (1962). The
biology of art. London: Methuen.
Murphy, M. (1992). The
future of the body. Los Angeles: Tarcher.
Rainer, K. (1991). William
Blake. London: Thames & Hudson.
Rosenblatt, R. (1994). The man in the water: Essays and stories.
New York:
Random House.
Sakharov,
B. (1993). Opening of the third eye (theory and practice of clairvoyance). Meditatio
[Kiev, Presa Ukrainy], 1, 7-69. (In Russian)
Sheldrake,
R. (1987). A new science of life: The hypothesis of formative causation (2nd
ed.). London: Collins.
Sheldrake,
R. (1994). Seven experiments that could change the world. London: Fourth
Estate.
Soidla,
T. R. (1993a). Morphic resonance, molecular structure, and man: Some
metaphysics. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 12(2),
51-55.
Soidla,
T. R. (1993b). A RNA-editing based model of memory. Folia Baeriana, 6,
261-268.
Soidla,
T. R. (1993с). Biological texts and
spiritual values. Revival of Russian Religious Philosophical Thought
(Proceedings of the International Conference, March 22-24, 1993). St.
Petersburg: Glagol, pp. 25-29.
Soidla,
T. R. (1995a). Open mouth, open mind: An impressionistic attempt at a
transpersonal autobiography. Part 1. "Energies" and states of
consciousness. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 14
(Supplement), 30-42.
Soidla,
T. R. (1995b). Open mouth, open mind: An impressionistic attempt at a
transpersonal autobiography. Part 2. Living and losing with high energies. International
Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 14 (Supplement), 43-59.
Soidla, T. R. (1995с). Practical molecular
book-keeping. Part 1. A basic model. Manuscript in preparation.
Soidla,
T. R. (1995d). 66 illegitimate questions on memory and consciousness. Manuscript
in preparation.
Stryker,
M. P. (1990). Summary: The brain in 1990. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on
Quantitative Biology, 55, 1049-1067.
Taimni,
I. K. (1974). The science of yoga. Adyar, India: Theosophical Publishing
House.
Tart, C. T. (1975).
States of consciousness. New York: Dutton.
Trungpa, C. (1987).
Cutting through spiritual materialism. Boston: Shambhala.
Walsh, R. (1993).
The transpersonal movement: A history and state of the art.
Journal of Transpersonal
Psychology, 25, 123-139.
Walsh, R., & Vaughan, F. (Eds.). (1993). Paths beyond ego:
The transpersonal
vision. Los Angeles:
Tarcher.
Watts, A. W. (1963). The two hands of God: The myths of polarity.
New York:
Braziller.
Williams, T. P. (1980). Transpersonal psychology: An introductory
guidebook.
Greeley, CO: Carol L. Lutey.
Woodroffe, J. (1972). The serpent power. Madras, India: Ganesh.
(Original work
published 1928)
Author's address: T. R. Soidla, Institute of
Cytology, Tikhoretsky Avenue 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, RUSSIA.